Joseph D. Romano

Guilherme Seidyo Imai Aldeia, Joseph D. Romano, Fabricio Olivetti de Franca et al.

Medical decision-making makes frequent use of algorithms that combine risk equations with rules, providing clear and standardized treatment pathways. Symbolic regression (SR) traditionally limits its search space to continuous function forms and their parameters, making it difficult to model this decision-making. However, due to its ability to derive data-driven, interpretable models, SR holds promise for developing data-driven clinical risk scores. To that end we introduce Brush, an SR algorithm that combines decision-tree-like splitting algorithms with non-linear constant optimization, allowing for seamless integration of rule-based logic into symbolic regression and classification models. Brush achieves Pareto-optimal performance on SRBench, and was applied to recapitulate two widely used clinical scoring systems, achieving high accuracy and interpretable models. Compared to decision trees, random forests, and other SR methods, Brush achieves comparable or superior predictive performance while producing simpler models.

Joseph D. Romano, Trang T. Le, William La Cava et al.

Motivation: Novel machine learning and statistical modeling studies rely on standardized comparisons to existing methods using well-studied benchmark datasets. Few tools exist that provide rapid access to many of these datasets through a standardized, user-friendly interface that integrates well with popular data science workflows. Results: This release of PMLB provides the largest collection of diverse, public benchmark datasets for evaluating new machine learning and data science methods aggregated in one location. v1.0 introduces a number of critical improvements developed following discussions with the open-source community. Availability: PMLB is available at https://github.com/EpistasisLab/pmlb. Python and R interfaces for PMLB can be installed through the Python Package Index and Comprehensive R Archive Network, respectively.

Joseph D. Romano, Trang T. Le, Weixuan Fu et al.

Automated machine learning (AutoML) and deep learning (DL) are two cutting-edge paradigms used to solve a myriad of inductive learning tasks. In spite of their successes, little guidance exists for when to choose one approach over the other in the context of specific real-world problems. Furthermore, relatively few tools exist that allow the integration of both AutoML and DL in the same analysis to yield results combining both of their strengths. Here, we seek to address both of these issues, by (1.) providing a head-to-head comparison of AutoML and DL in the context of binary classification on 6 well-characterized public datasets, and (2.) evaluating a new tool for genetic programming-based AutoML that incorporates deep estimators. Our observations suggest that AutoML outperforms simple DL classifiers when trained on similar datasets for binary classification but integrating DL into AutoML improves classification performance even further. However, the substantial time needed to train AutoML+DL pipelines will likely outweigh performance advantages in many applications.