Thiago R. Ramos

Matheus Barreto, Mário de Castro, Thiago R. Ramos et al.

Modern machine learning models can be accurate on average yet still make mistakes that dominate deployment cost. We introduce Locus, a distribution-free wrapper that produces a per-input loss-scale reliability score for a fixed prediction function. Rather than quantifying uncertainty about the label, Locus models the realized loss of the prediction function using any engine that outputs a predictive distribution for the loss given an input. A simple split-calibration step turns this function into a distribution-free interpretable score that is comparable across inputs and can be read as an upper loss level. The score is useful on its own for ranking, and it can optionally be thresholded to obtain a transparent flagging rule with distribution-free control of large-loss events. Experiments across 13 regression benchmarks show that Locus yields effective risk ranking and reduces large-loss frequency compared to standard heuristics.

Thiago R. Ramos, Helton Graziadei, Luben M. C. Cabezas

Split conformal prediction provides finite-sample marginal coverage under exchangeability, but this guarantee averages over the random calibration sample. We study instead the law of the calibration-conditional coverage induced by a realized conformal threshold. In the continuous i.i.d. setting this law is exactly $Beta(k,n+1-k)$, so the usual marginal guarantee corresponds to its mean. We take this beta law as a finite-sample reference object and quantify departures from it using Wasserstein distances on $[0,1]$. The framework yields direct bounds on marginal coverage gaps and on bad-calibration probabilities, and separates different sources of non-i.i.d. behavior according to how they deform the beta reference: test-side shift acts through a transport map on the coverage scale, while calibration dependence changes the order-statistic law itself. We instantiate the framework in scale-shift, clustered, and stationary mixing settings, where the induced deformations can be characterized explicitly or through Berry-Esseen approximations. Simulations on dependent processes confirm that the first-order approximation tracks the empirical Wasserstein distance even at moderate sample sizes.

Luben M. C. Cabezas, Vagner S. Santos, Thiago R. Ramos et al.

Conformal prediction methods create prediction bands with distribution-free guarantees but do not explicitly capture epistemic uncertainty, which can lead to overconfident predictions in data-sparse regions. Although recent conformal scores have been developed to address this limitation, they are typically designed for specific tasks, such as regression or quantile regression. Moreover, they rely on particular modeling choices for epistemic uncertainty, restricting their applicability. We introduce $\texttt{EPICSCORE}$, a model-agnostic approach that enhances any conformal score by explicitly integrating epistemic uncertainty. Leveraging Bayesian techniques such as Gaussian Processes, Monte Carlo Dropout, or Bayesian Additive Regression Trees, $\texttt{EPICSCORE}$ adaptively expands predictive intervals in regions with limited data while maintaining compact intervals where data is abundant. As with any conformal method, it preserves finite-sample marginal coverage. Additionally, it also achieves asymptotic conditional coverage. Experiments demonstrate its good performance compared to existing methods. Designed for compatibility with any Bayesian model, but equipped with distribution-free guarantees, $\texttt{EPICSCORE}$ provides a general-purpose framework for uncertainty quantification in prediction problems.

Lucas P. Amaral, Luben M. C. Cabezas, Thiago R. Ramos et al.

Dirichlet regression models are suitable for compositional data, in which the response variable represents proportions that sum to one. However, there are still no well-established methods for constructing valid prediction sets in this context, especially considering the geometry of the compositional space. In this work, we investigate conformal prediction-based strategies for constructing valid predictive regions in Dirichlet regression models. We evaluate three distinct approaches: a method based on quantile residuals, an approximate construction of highest density regions (HDR), and an adaptation of the approximate HDR using grid-based discretization over the simplex. The performance of the methods was analyzed through simulation studies under different scenarios, varying the model complexity, response dimensionality, and covariate structure. The results indicated that the HDR approximation approach exhibits good robustness in terms of coverage, while the grid discretization proved effective in reducing overcoverage and the area of the prediction region compared to the original method. The quantile method provided larger prediction regions compared to the grid method, while maintaining adequate coverage. The methodologies were also applied to two real datasets: one concerning sleep stages and another on biomass allocation in plants. In both cases, the proposed methods demonstrated practical feasibility and produced coherent interpretations within the compositional space. Finally, we discuss possible extensions of this work

Luben M. C. Cabezas, Vagner S. Santos, Thiago R. Ramos et al.

Current experimental scientists have been increasingly relying on simulation-based inference (SBI) to invert complex non-linear models with intractable likelihoods. However, posterior approximations obtained with SBI are often miscalibrated, causing credible regions to undercover true parameters. We develop $\texttt{CP4SBI}$, a model-agnostic conformal calibration framework that constructs credible sets with local Bayesian coverage. Our two proposed variants, namely local calibration via regression trees and CDF-based calibration, enable finite-sample local coverage guarantees for any scoring function, including HPD, symmetric, and quantile-based regions. Experiments on widely used SBI benchmarks demonstrate that our approach improves the quality of uncertainty quantification for neural posterior estimators using both normalizing flows and score-diffusion modeling.