Yanwei Huang

Yunfan Zhou, Qiming Shi, Zhongsu Luo et al.

LLM-driven tools have significantly lowered barriers to writing SQL queries. However, user instructions are often underspecified, assuming the model understands implicit knowledge, such as dataset schemas, domain conventions, and task-specific requirements, that isn't explicitly provided. This results in frequently erroneous scripts that require users to repeatedly clarify their intent. Additionally, users struggle to validate generated scripts because they cannot verify whether the model correctly applied implicit knowledge. We present Cerebra, an interactive NL-to-SQL tool that aligns implicit knowledge between users and LLMs during SQL authoring. Cerebra automatically retrieves implicit knowledge from historical SQL scripts based on user instructions, presents this knowledge in an interactive tree view for code review, and supports iterative refinement to improve generated scripts. To evaluate the effectiveness and usability of Cerebra, we conducted a user study with 16 participants, demonstrating its improved support for customized SQL authoring. The source code of Cerebra is available at https://github.com/zjuidg/CHI26-Cerebra.

Kai Xiong, Yanwei Huang, Rongjunchen Zhang et al.

High-quality mathematical and logical datasets with verifiable answers are essential for strengthening the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs). While recent data augmentation techniques have facilitated the creation of large-scale benchmarks, existing LLM-generated datasets often suffer from limited reliability, diversity, and scalability. To address these challenges, we introduce PuzzleClone, a formal framework for synthesizing verifiable data at scale using Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). Our approach features three key innovations: (1) encoding seed puzzles into structured logical specifications, (2) generating scalable variants through systematic variable and constraint randomization, and (3) ensuring validity via a reproduction mechanism. Applying PuzzleClone, we construct a curated benchmark comprising over 83K diverse and programmatically validated puzzles. The generated puzzles span a wide spectrum of difficulty and formats, posing significant challenges to current state-of-the-art models. We conduct post training (SFT and RL) on PuzzleClone datasets. Experimental results show that training on PuzzleClone yields substantial improvements not only on PuzzleClone testset but also on logic and mathematical benchmarks. Post training raises PuzzleClone average from 14.4 to 56.2 and delivers consistent improvements across 7 logic and mathematical benchmarks up to 12.5 absolute percentage points (AMC2023 from 52.5 to 65.0). Our code and data are available at https://github.com/HiThink-Research/PuzzleClone.

Zhenning Chen, Hanbei Zhan, Yanwei Huang et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional capabilities in factual question answering, yet they sometimes provide incorrect responses. To address this issue, knowledge editing techniques have emerged as effective methods for correcting factual information in LLMs. However, typical knowledge editing workflows struggle with identifying the optimal set of model layers for editing and rely on summary indicators that provide insufficient guidance. This lack of transparency hinders effective comparison and identification of optimal editing strategies. In this paper, we present KEditVis, a novel visual analytics system designed to assist users in gaining a deeper understanding of knowledge editing through interactive visualizations, improving editing outcomes, and discovering valuable insights for the future development of knowledge editing algorithms. With KEditVis, users can select appropriate layers as the editing target, explore the reasons behind ineffective edits, and perform more targeted and effective edits. Our evaluation, including usage scenarios, expert interviews, and a user study, validates the effectiveness and usability of the system.