3.3DCApr 12, 2022
The MIT Supercloud Workload Classification ChallengeBenny J. Tang, Qiqi Chen, Matthew L. Weiss et al. · berkeley
High-Performance Computing (HPC) centers and cloud providers support an increasingly diverse set of applications on heterogenous hardware. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) workloads have become an increasingly larger share of the compute workloads, new approaches to optimized resource usage, allocation, and deployment of new AI frameworks are needed. By identifying compute workloads and their utilization characteristics, HPC systems may be able to better match available resources with the application demand. By leveraging datacenter instrumentation, it may be possible to develop AI-based approaches that can identify workloads and provide feedback to researchers and datacenter operators for improving operational efficiency. To enable this research, we released the MIT Supercloud Dataset, which provides detailed monitoring logs from the MIT Supercloud cluster. This dataset includes CPU and GPU usage by jobs, memory usage, and file system logs. In this paper, we present a workload classification challenge based on this dataset. We introduce a labelled dataset that can be used to develop new approaches to workload classification and present initial results based on existing approaches. The goal of this challenge is to foster algorithmic innovations in the analysis of compute workloads that can achieve higher accuracy than existing methods. Data and code will be made publicly available via the Datacenter Challenge website : https://dcc.mit.edu.
Lincoln AI Computing Survey (LAICS) UpdateAlbert Reuther, Peter Michaleas, Michael Jones et al.
This paper is an update of the survey of AI accelerators and processors from past four years, which is now called the Lincoln AI Computing Survey - LAICS (pronounced "lace"). As in past years, this paper collects and summarizes the current commercial accelerators that have been publicly announced with peak performance and peak power consumption numbers. The performance and power values are plotted on a scatter graph, and a number of dimensions and observations from the trends on this plot are again discussed and analyzed. Market segments are highlighted on the scatter plot, and zoomed plots of each segment are also included. Finally, a brief description of each of the new accelerators that have been added in the survey this year is included.
6.7DCMar 23
Interactive and Urgent HPC: State of the ResearchAlbert Reuther, William Arndt, Johannes Blaschke et al.
When we think of how we use smartphones, e-commerce, collaboration platforms, LLMs, etc., most of our interactions with computers are interactive and often urgent. Similar trends of interactivity and urgency are coming to HPC, with applications from simulations to data analysis and machine learning requiring more parallel computational capability and more interactivity. This chapter overviews the progress made so far along with some vectors of what the path forward will bring for greater integration of interactive and urgent HPC policies, techniques, and technologies into our HPC ecosystems.
AI Accelerator Survey and TrendsAlbert Reuther, Peter Michaleas, Michael Jones et al.
Over the past several years, new machine learning accelerators were being announced and released every month for a variety of applications from speech recognition, video object detection, assisted driving, and many data center applications. This paper updates the survey of AI accelerators and processors from past two years. This paper collects and summarizes the current commercial accelerators that have been publicly announced with peak performance and power consumption numbers. The performance and power values are plotted on a scatter graph, and a number of dimensions and observations from the trends on this plot are again discussed and analyzed. This year, we also compile a list of benchmarking performance results and compute the computational efficiency with respect to peak performance.
1.2DBAug 26, 2021
Supercomputing Enabled Deployable Analytics for Disaster ResponseKaira Samuel, Jeremy Kepner, Michael Jones et al.
First responders and other forward deployed essential workers can benefit from advanced analytics. Limited network access and software security requirements prevent the usage of standard cloud based microservice analytic platforms that are typically used in industry. One solution is to precompute a wide range of analytics as files that can be used with standard preinstalled software that does not require network access or additional software and can run on a wide range of legacy hardware. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, this approach was tested for providing geo-spatial census data to allow quick analysis of demographic data for better responding to emergencies. These data were processed using the MIT SuperCloud to create several thousand Google Earth and Microsoft Excel files representative of many advanced analytics. The fast mapping of census data using Google Earth and Microsoft Excel has the potential to give emergency responders a powerful tool to improve emergency preparedness. Our approach displays relevant census data (total population, population under 15, population over 65, median age) per census block, sorted by county, through a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (xlsx file) and Google Earth map (kml file). The spreadsheet interface includes features that allow users to convert between different longitude and latitude coordinate units. For the Google Earth files, a variety of absolute and relative colors maps of population density have been explored to provide an intuitive and meaningful interface. Using several hundred cores on the MIT SuperCloud, new analytics can be generated in a few minutes.
8.6DCAug 4, 2021
The MIT Supercloud DatasetSiddharth Samsi, Matthew L Weiss, David Bestor et al.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and Machine learning (ML) workloads are an increasingly larger share of the compute workloads in traditional High-Performance Computing (HPC) centers and commercial cloud systems. This has led to changes in deployment approaches of HPC clusters and the commercial cloud, as well as a new focus on approaches to optimized resource usage, allocations and deployment of new AI frame- works, and capabilities such as Jupyter notebooks to enable rapid prototyping and deployment. With these changes, there is a need to better understand cluster/datacenter operations with the goal of developing improved scheduling policies, identifying inefficiencies in resource utilization, energy/power consumption, failure prediction, and identifying policy violations. In this paper we introduce the MIT Supercloud Dataset which aims to foster innovative AI/ML approaches to the analysis of large scale HPC and datacenter/cloud operations. We provide detailed monitoring logs from the MIT Supercloud system, which include CPU and GPU usage by jobs, memory usage, file system logs, and physical monitoring data. This paper discusses the details of the dataset, collection methodology, data availability, and discusses potential challenge problems being developed using this data. Datasets and future challenge announcements will be available via https://dcc.mit.edu.
17.3DCSep 1, 2020
Survey of Machine Learning AcceleratorsAlbert Reuther, Peter Michaleas, Michael Jones et al.
New machine learning accelerators are being announced and released each month for a variety of applications from speech recognition, video object detection, assisted driving, and many data center applications. This paper updates the survey of of AI accelerators and processors from last year's IEEE-HPEC paper. This paper collects and summarizes the current accelerators that have been publicly announced with performance and power consumption numbers. The performance and power values are plotted on a scatter graph and a number of dimensions and observations from the trends on this plot are discussed and analyzed. For instance, there are interesting trends in the plot regarding power consumption, numerical precision, and inference versus training. This year, there are many more announced accelerators that are implemented with many more architectures and technologies from vector engines, dataflow engines, neuromorphic designs, flash-based analog memory processing, and photonic-based processing.
8.5LGJul 14, 2020
Layer-Parallel Training with GPU Concurrency of Deep Residual Neural Networks via Nonlinear MultigridAndrew C. Kirby, Siddharth Samsi, Michael Jones et al.
A Multigrid Full Approximation Storage algorithm for solving Deep Residual Networks is developed to enable neural network parallelized layer-wise training and concurrent computational kernel execution on GPUs. This work demonstrates a 10.2x speedup over traditional layer-wise model parallelism techniques using the same number of compute units.
5.0LGMar 25, 2020
GraphChallenge.org Sparse Deep Neural Network PerformanceJeremy Kepner, Simon Alford, Vijay Gadepally et al.
The MIT/IEEE/Amazon GraphChallenge.org encourages community approaches to developing new solutions for analyzing graphs and sparse data. Sparse AI analytics present unique scalability difficulties. The Sparse Deep Neural Network (DNN) Challenge draws upon prior challenges from machine learning, high performance computing, and visual analytics to create a challenge that is reflective of emerging sparse AI systems. The sparse DNN challenge is based on a mathematically well-defined DNN inference computation and can be implemented in any programming environment. In 2019 several sparse DNN challenge submissions were received from a wide range of authors and organizations. This paper presents a performance analysis of the best performers of these submissions. These submissions show that their state-of-the-art sparse DNN execution time, $T_{\rm DNN}$, is a strong function of the number of DNN operations performed, $N_{\rm op}$. The sparse DNN challenge provides a clear picture of current sparse DNN systems and underscores the need for new innovations to achieve high performance on very large sparse DNNs.
11.9AIMay 8, 2019
AI Enabling Technologies: A SurveyVijay Gadepally, Justin Goodwin, Jeremy Kepner et al.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the opportunity to revolutionize the way the United States Department of Defense (DoD) and Intelligence Community (IC) address the challenges of evolving threats, data deluge, and rapid courses of action. Developing an end-to-end artificial intelligence system involves parallel development of different pieces that must work together in order to provide capabilities that can be used by decision makers, warfighters and analysts. These pieces include data collection, data conditioning, algorithms, computing, robust artificial intelligence, and human-machine teaming. While much of the popular press today surrounds advances in algorithms and computing, most modern AI systems leverage advances across numerous different fields. Further, while certain components may not be as visible to end-users as others, our experience has shown that each of these interrelated components play a major role in the success or failure of an AI system. This article is meant to highlight many of these technologies that are involved in an end-to-end AI system. The goal of this article is to provide readers with an overview of terminology, technical details and recent highlights from academia, industry and government. Where possible, we indicate relevant resources that can be used for further reading and understanding.
3.3DCAug 25, 2018
Hyperscaling Internet Graph Analysis with D4M on the MIT SuperCloudVijay Gadepally, Jeremy Kepner, Lauren Milechin et al.
Detecting anomalous behavior in network traffic is a major challenge due to the volume and velocity of network traffic. For example, a 10 Gigabit Ethernet connection can generate over 50 MB/s of packet headers. For global network providers, this challenge can be amplified by many orders of magnitude. Development of novel computer network traffic analytics requires: high level programming environments, massive amount of packet capture (PCAP) data, and diverse data products for "at scale" algorithm pipeline development. D4M (Dynamic Distributed Dimensional Data Model) combines the power of sparse linear algebra, associative arrays, parallel processing, and distributed databases (such as SciDB and Apache Accumulo) to provide a scalable data and computation system that addresses the big data problems associated with network analytics development. Combining D4M with the MIT SuperCloud manycore processors and parallel storage system enables network analysts to interactively process massive amounts of data in minutes. To demonstrate these capabilities, we have implemented a representative analytics pipeline in D4M and benchmarked it on 96 hours of Gigabit PCAP data with MIT SuperCloud. The entire pipeline from uncompressing the raw files to database ingest was implemented in 135 lines of D4M code and achieved speedups of over 20,000.
5.9DCJul 19, 2017
MIT SuperCloud Portal Workspace: Enabling HPC Web Application DeploymentAndrew Prout, William Arcand, David Bestor et al.
The MIT SuperCloud Portal Workspace enables the secure exposure of web services running on high performance computing (HPC) systems. The portal allows users to run any web application as an HPC job and access it from their workstation while providing authentication, encryption, and access control at the system level to prevent unintended access. This capability permits users to seamlessly utilize existing and emerging tools that present their user interface as a website on an HPC system creating a portal workspace. Performance measurements indicate that the MIT SuperCloud Portal Workspace incurs marginal overhead when compared to a direct connection of the same service.
4.3DCJul 11, 2016
Enhancing HPC Security with a User-Based FirewallAndrew Prout, William Arcand, David Bestor et al.
HPC systems traditionally allow their users unrestricted use of their internal network. While this network is normally controlled enough to guarantee privacy without the need for encryption, it does not provide a method to authenticate peer connections. Protocols built upon this internal network must provide their own authentication. Many methods have been employed to perform this authentication. However, support for all of these methods requires the HPC application developer to include support and the user to configure and enable these services. The user-based firewall capability we have prototyped enables a set of rules governing connections across the HPC internal network to be put into place using Linux netfilter. By using an operating system-level capability, the system is not reliant on any developer or user actions to enable security. The rules we have chosen and implemented are crafted to not impact the vast majority of users and be completely invisible to them.
3.8SEOct 7, 2015
Building Resource Adaptive Software Systems (BRASS): Objectives and System EvaluationJeffrey Hughes, Cassandra Sparks, Alley Stoughton et al.
As modern software systems continue inexorably to increase in complexity and capability, users have become accustomed to periodic cycles of updating and upgrading to avoid obsolescence -- if at some cost in terms of frustration. In the case of the U.S. military, having access to well-functioning software systems and underlying content is critical to national security, but updates are no less problematic than among civilian users and often demand considerable time and expense. To address these challenges, DARPA has announced a new four-year research project to investigate the fundamental computational and algorithmic requirements necessary for software systems and data to remain robust and functional in excess of 100 years. The Building Resource Adaptive Software Systems, or BRASS, program seeks to realize foundational advances in the design and implementation of long-lived software systems that can dynamically adapt to changes in the resources they depend upon and environments in which they operate. MIT Lincoln Laboratory will provide the test framework and evaluation of proposed software tools in support of this revolutionary vision.