Vivin Vinod

Vivin Vinod, Peter Zaspel

Machine learning has accelerated quantum chemistry but is hindered by the prohibitive cost of generating high fidelity training data. Multifidelity machine learning (MFML) mitigates this overhead by systematically combining abundant low fidelity data with sparse high fidelity data. In spite of its success, standard MFML schemes rely on pre-defined scaling factors to determine sparse data ratio across fidelities, often generating redundant multifidelity data resulting in a loss of efficiency. Here, we introduce an adaptive on-the-fly multifidelity framework for machine learning that autonomously determines training dataset composition. By dynamically querying training samples at each fidelity, the algorithm saturates model accuracy at lower fidelities before moving up to more expensive reference calculations. We benchmark the novel adaptive-MFML across diverse chemical properties including the computational chemistry gold standard coupled cluster energies, and the more chemically challenging excitation energies. In our numerical experiments we show that our adaptive algorithm reduces data generation costs by up to a factor of 30 compared to single fidelity methods and improves upon standard MFML by up to a factor of 5. The mitigation of data redundancy establishes a high-accuracy low-cost pathway for sustainable cost-aware machine learning in quantum chemistry.

Vivin Vinod, Peter Zaspel

Multifidelity machine learning (MFML) for quantum chemical (QC) properties has seen strong development in the recent years. The method has been shown to reduce the cost of generating training data for high-accuracy low-cost ML models. In such a set-up, the ML models are trained on molecular geometries and some property of interest computed at various computational chemistry accuracies, or fidelities. These are then combined in training the MFML models. In some multifidelity models, the training data is required to be nested, that is the same molecular geometries are included to calculate the property across all the fidelities. In these multifidelity models, the requirement of a nested configuration restricts the kind of sampling that can be performed while selection training samples at different fidelities. This work assesses the use of non-nested training data for two of these multifidelity methods, namely MFML and optimized MFML (o-MFML). The assessment is carried out for the prediction of ground state energies and first vertical excitation energies of a diverse collection of molecules of the CheMFi dataset. Results indicate that the MFML method still requires a nested structure of training data across the fidelities. However, the o-MFML method shows promising results for non-nested multifidelity training data with model errors comparable to the nested configurations.

Vivin Vinod, Peter Zaspel

Recent progress in machine learning (ML) has made high-accuracy quantum chemistry (QC) calculations more accessible. Of particular interest are multifidelity machine learning (MFML) methods where training data from differing accuracies or fidelities are used. These methods usually employ a fixed scaling factor, $γ$, to relate the number of training samples across different fidelities, which reflects the cost and assumed sparsity of the data. This study investigates the impact of modifying $γ$ on model efficiency and accuracy for the prediction of vertical excitation energies using the QeMFi benchmark dataset. Further, this work introduces QC compute time informed scaling factors, denoted as $θ$, that vary based on QC compute times at different fidelities. A novel error metric, error contours of MFML, is proposed to provide a comprehensive view of model error contributions from each fidelity. The results indicate that high model accuracy can be achieved with just 2 training samples at the target fidelity when a larger number of samples from lower fidelities are used. This is further illustrated through a novel concept, the $Γ$-curve, which compares model error against the time-cost of generating training samples, demonstrating that multifidelity models can achieve high accuracy while minimizing training data costs.

Vivin Vinod, Peter Zaspel

Uncertainty quantification is an important scheme in active learning techniques, including applications in predicting quantum chemical properties. In quantum chemical calculations, there exists the notion of a fidelity, a less accurate computation is accessible at a cheaper computational cost. This work proposes a novel low-fidelity informed uncertainty quantification for active learning with applications in predicting diverse quantum chemical properties such as excitation energies and \textit{ab initio} potential energy surfaces. Computational experiments are carried out in order to assess the proposed method with results demonstrating that models trained with the novel method outperform alternatives in terms of empirical error and number of iterations required. The effect of the choice of fidelity is also studied to perform a thorough benchmark.

Vivin Vinod, Peter Zaspel

The development of machine learning (ML) methods has made quantum chemistry (QC) calculations more accessible by reducing the compute cost incurred in conventional QC methods. This has since been translated into the overhead cost of generating training data. Increased work in reducing the cost of generating training data resulted in the development of $Δ$-ML and multifidelity machine learning methods which use data at more than one QC level of accuracy, or fidelity. This work compares the data costs associated with $Δ$-ML, multifidelity machine learning (MFML), and optimized MFML (o-MFML) in contrast with a newly introduced Multifidelity$Δ$-Machine Learning (MF$Δ$ML) method for the prediction of ground state energies, vertical excitation energies, and the magnitude of electronic contribution of molecular dipole moments from the multifidelity benchmark dataset QeMFi. This assessment is made on the basis of training data generation cost associated with each model and is compared with the single fidelity kernel ridge regression (KRR) case. The results indicate that the use of multifidelity methods surpasses the standard $Δ$-ML approaches in cases of a large number of predictions. For applications which require only a few evaluations to be made using ML models, while the $Δ$-ML method might be favored, the MF$Δ$ML method is shown to be more efficient.

Vivin Vinod, Peter Zaspel

Progress in both Machine Learning (ML) and Quantum Chemistry (QC) methods have resulted in high accuracy ML models for QC properties. Datasets such as MD17 and WS22 have been used to benchmark these models at some level of QC method, or fidelity, which refers to the accuracy of the chosen QC method. Multifidelity ML (MFML) methods, where models are trained on data from more than one fidelity, have shown to be effective over single fidelity methods. Much research is progressing in this direction for diverse applications ranging from energy band gaps to excitation energies. One hurdle for effective research here is the lack of a diverse multifidelity dataset for benchmarking. We provide the Quantum chemistry MultiFidelity (QeMFi) dataset consisting of five fidelities calculated with the TD-DFT formalism. The fidelities differ in their basis set choice: STO-3G, 3-21G, 6-31G, def2-SVP, and def2-TZVP. QeMFi offers to the community a variety of QC properties such as vertical excitation properties and molecular dipole moments, further including QC computation times allowing for a time benefit benchmark of multifidelity models for ML-QC.

Vivin Vinod, Sayan Maity, Peter Zaspel et al.

The accurate but fast calculation of molecular excited states is still a very challenging topic. For many applications, detailed knowledge of the energy funnel in larger molecular aggregates is of key importance requiring highly accurate excited state energies. To this end, machine learning techniques can be an extremely useful tool though the cost of generating highly accurate training datasets still remains a severe challenge. To overcome this hurdle, this work proposes the use of multi-fidelity machine learning where very little training data from high accuracies is combined with cheaper and less accurate data to achieve the accuracy of the costlier level. In the present study, the approach is employed to predict the first excited state energies for three molecules of increasing size, namely, benzene, naphthalene, and anthracene. The energies are trained and tested for conformations stemming from classical molecular dynamics simulations and from real-time density functional tight-binding calculations. It can be shown that the multi-fidelity machine learning model can achieve the same accuracy as a machine learning model built only on high cost training data while having a much lower computational effort to generate the data. The numerical gain observed in these benchmark test calculations was over a factor of 30 but certainly can be much higher for high accuracy data.