Rohan Charudatt Salvi

Chirag Chawla, Rohan Charudatt Salvi, Madhav S. Baidya

Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) has emerged as an effective reinforcement-learning algorithm for aligning language models on reasoning tasks, but it treats every token position and every sampled rollout symmetrically. We introduce two complementary extensions: (i) Adaptive-Horizon GRPO (AH-GRPO), which weights each token's policy gradient using a cumulative entropy-based discount that reduces the effective horizon when the model is uncertain, and (ii) Selective-Advantage AH-GRPO (SA-AH-GRPO), which applies this discounting only to negative-advantage rollouts, leaving positive-advantage, successful trajectories unattenuated. We evaluate standard GRPO with alpha = 0, AH-GRPO with alpha = 0.5, and SA-AH-GRPO with alpha = 0.5 on the GSM8K mathematical reasoning benchmark using both Qwen 2.5-1.5B-Instruct and Qwen 2.5-3B-Instruct fine-tuned with LoRA. On the 3B model, SA-AH-GRPO achieves Pass@1 = 0.858 at its peak at step 30 and maintains 0.846 at 180 steps, with training variance reduced to 0.0246, a 3.6 times reduction relative to GRPO while matching its peak accuracy. On the 1.5B model, SA-AH-GRPO achieves a peak Pass@1 of 0.686, improving over the zero-shot baseline of 0.637. Our analysis shows that asymmetric discounting preserves the full gradient signal on correct solutions, prevents entropy collapse, and substantially stabilises training, suggesting a principled inductive bias for reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards on structured generation tasks.

Rohan Charudatt Salvi, Chirag Chawla, Dhruv Jain et al.

Automatic medical text simplification plays a key role in improving health literacy by making complex biomedical research accessible to diverse readers. However, most existing resources assume a single generic audience, overlooking the wide variation in medical literacy and information needs across user groups. To address this limitation, we introduce PERCS (Persona-guided Controllable Summarization), a dataset of biomedical abstracts paired with summaries tailored to four personas: Laypersons, Premedical Students, Non-medical Researchers, and Medical Experts. These personas represent different levels of medical literacy and information needs, emphasizing the need for targeted, audience-specific summarization. Each summary in PERCS was reviewed by physicians for factual accuracy and persona alignment using a detailed error taxonomy. Technical validation shows clear differences in readability, vocabulary, and content depth across personas. Along with describing the dataset, we benchmark four large language models on PERCS using automatic evaluation metrics that assess comprehensiveness, readability, and faithfulness, establishing baseline results for future research. The dataset, annotation guidelines, and evaluation materials are publicly available to support research on persona-specific communication and controllable biomedical summarization.