Yingfan Wang

Yingfan Wang, Guoliang Kang

Domain Generalization (DG) aims to learn a model from multiple source domains to achieve satisfactory performance on unseen target domains. Recent works introduce CLIP to DG tasks due to its superior image-text alignment and zeros-shot performance. Previous methods either utilize full fine-tuning or prompt-learning paradigms to harness CLIP for DG tasks. Those works focus on avoiding catastrophic forgetting of the original knowledge encoded in CLIP but ignore that the knowledge encoded in CLIP in nature may contain domain-specific cues that constrain its domain generalization performance. In this paper, we propose a new perspective to harness CLIP for DG, i.e., attention head purification. We observe that different attention heads may encode different properties of an image and selecting heads appropriately may yield remarkable performance improvement across domains. Based on such observations, we purify the attention heads of CLIP from two levels, including task-level purification and domain-level purification. For task-level purification, we design head-aware LoRA to make each head more adapted to the task we considered. For domain-level purification, we perform head selection via a simple gating strategy. We utilize MMD loss to encourage masked head features to be more domain-invariant to emphasize more generalizable properties/heads. During training, we jointly perform task-level purification and domain-level purification. We conduct experiments on various representative DG benchmarks. Though simple, extensive experiments demonstrate that our method performs favorably against previous state-of-the-arts.

Zhaoyi Joey Hou, Tanya Shourya, Yingfan Wang et al.

Evaluating conversational AI systems that use external tools is challenging, as errors can arise from complex interactions among user, agent, and tools. While existing evaluation methods assess either user satisfaction or agents' tool-calling capabilities, they fail to capture critical errors in multi-turn tool-augmented dialogues-such as when agents misinterpret tool results yet appear satisfactory to users. We introduce TRACE, a benchmark of systematically synthesized tool-augmented conversations covering diverse error cases, and SCOPE, an evaluation framework that automatically discovers diverse error patterns and evaluation rubrics in tool-augmented dialogues. Experiments show SCOPE significantly outperforms the baseline, particularly on challenging cases where user satisfaction signals are misleading.