14.9ROFeb 9, 2022
Soft Robots Learn to Crawl: Jointly Optimizing Design and Control with Sim-to-Real TransferCharles Schaff, Audrey Sedal, Matthew R. Walter
This work provides a complete framework for the simulation, co-optimization, and sim-to-real transfer of the design and control of soft legged robots. The compliance of soft robots provides a form of "mechanical intelligence" -- the ability to passively exhibit behaviors that would otherwise be difficult to program. Exploiting this capacity requires careful consideration of the coupling between mechanical design and control. Co-optimization provides a promising means to generate sophisticated soft robots by reasoning over this coupling. However, the complex nature of soft robot dynamics makes it difficult to provide a simulation environment that is both sufficiently accurate to allow for sim-to-real transfer, while also being fast enough for contemporary co-optimization algorithms. In this work, we show that finite element simulation combined with recent model order reduction techniques provide both the efficiency and the accuracy required to successfully learn effective soft robot design-control pairs that transfer to reality. We propose a reinforcement learning-based framework for co-optimization and demonstrate successful optimization, construction, and zero-shot sim-to-real transfer of several soft crawling robots. Our learned robot outperforms an expert-designed crawling robot, showing that our approach can generate novel, high-performing designs even in well-understood domains.
11.6ROJan 31, 2019
Comparison and Experimental Validation of Predictive Models for Soft, Fiber-Reinforced ActuatorsAudrey Sedal, Alan Wineman, R Brent Gillespie et al.
Successful soft robot modeling approaches appearing in recent literature have been based on a variety of distinct theories, including traditional robotic theory, continuum mechanics, and machine learning. Though specific modeling techniques have been developed for and validated against already realized systems, their strengths and weaknesses have not been explicitly compared against each other. In this paper, we show how three distinct model structures ---a lumped-parameter model, a continuum mechanical model, and a neural network--- compare in capturing the gross trends and specific features of the force generation of soft robotic actuators. In particular, we study models for Fiber Reinforced Elastomeric Enclosures (FREEs), which are a popular choice of soft actuator and that are used in several soft articulated systems, including soft manipulators, exoskeletons, grippers, and locomoting soft robots. We generated benchmark data by testing eight FREE samples that spanned broad design and kinematic spaces and compared the models on their ability to predict the loading-deformation relationships of these samples. This comparison shows the predictive capabilities of each model on individual actuators and each model's generalizability across the design space. While the neural net achieved the highest peak performance, the first principles-based models generalized best across all actuator design parameters tested. The results highlight the essential roles of mathematical structure and experimental parameter determination in building high-performing, generalizable soft actuator models with varying effort invested in system identification.