Emma Rafkin

Mary Versa Clemens-Sewall, Christopher Cervantes, Emma Rafkin et al.

This report provides practical guidance to teams designing or developing AI-enabled systems for how to promote trustworthiness during the data curation phase of development. In this report, the authors first define data, the data curation phase, and trustworthiness. We then describe a series of steps that the development team, especially data scientists, can take to build a trustworthy AI-enabled system. We enumerate the sequence of core steps and trace parallel paths where alternatives exist. The descriptions of these steps include strengths, weaknesses, preconditions, outcomes, and relevant open-source software tool implementations. In total, this report is a synthesis of data curation tools and approaches from relevant academic literature, and our goal is to equip readers with a diverse yet coherent set of practices for improving AI trustworthiness.

Emma Rafkin, Dan DeGenaro, Xiulin Yang

The development of resource-constrained approaches to automatic speech recognition (ASR) is of great interest due to its broad applicability to many low-resource languages for which there is scant usable data. Existing approaches to many low-resource natural language processing tasks leverage additional data from higher-resource languages that are closely related to a target low-resource language. One increasingly popular approach uses task arithmetic to combine models trained on different tasks to create a model for a task where there is little to no training data. In this paper, we consider training on a particular language to be a task, and we generate task vectors by fine-tuning variants of the Whisper ASR system. For pairs of high- and low-resource languages, we merge task vectors via a linear combination which is optimized on the downstream word error rate on the low-resource target language's validation set. Across 23 low-resource target languages for which we evaluate this technique, we find consistent word error rate improvements of up to 10% compared to a baseline without our approach.