Gido Kato

Gido Kato, Yoshihiro Fukuhara, Mariko Isogawa et al.

To protect privacy and prevent malicious use of deepfake, current studies propose methods that interfere with the generation process, such as detection and destruction approaches. However, these methods suffer from sub-optimal generalization performance to unseen models and add undesirable noise to the original image. To address these problems, we propose a new problem formulation for deepfake prevention: generating a ``scapegoat image'' by modifying the style of the original input in a way that is recognizable as an avatar by the user, but impossible to reconstruct the real face. Even in the case of malicious deepfake, the privacy of the users is still protected. To achieve this, we introduce an optimization-based editing method that utilizes GAN inversion to discourage deepfake models from generating similar scapegoats. We validate the effectiveness of our proposed method through quantitative and user studies.

Masatoshi Tateno, Gido Kato, Hirokatsu Kataoka et al.

Hand-object interaction (HOI) inherently involves dynamics where human manipulations produce distinct spatio-temporal effects on objects. However, existing semantic HOI benchmarks focused either on manipulation or on the resulting effects at a coarse level, lacking fine-grained spatio-temporal reasoning to capture the underlying dynamics in HOI. We introduce HanDyVQA, a fine-grained video question-answering benchmark that comprehensively covers both the manipulation and effect aspects of HOI. HanDyVQA comprises six complementary question types (Action, Process, Objects, Location, State Change, and Object Parts), totalling 11.1K multiple-choice QA pairs. Collected QA pairs recognizing manipulation styles, hand/object motions, and part-level state changes. HanDyVQA also includes 10.3K segmentation masks for Objects and Object Parts questions, enabling the evaluation of object/part-level reasoning in video object segmentation. We evaluated recent video foundation models on our benchmark and found that even the best-performing model, Gemini-2.5-Pro, reached only 73% average accuracy, which is far from human performance (97%). Further analysis shows the remaining challenges in spatial relationship, motion, and part-level geometric understanding. We also found that integrating explicit HOI-related cues into visual features improves performance, offering insights for developing future models with a deeper understanding of HOI dynamics.