Yong Liu

Hao Yi, Qingyang Li, Yulan Hu et al.

Recently, enhancing the numerical and logical reasoning capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) has emerged as a research hotspot. Existing methods face several limitations: inference-phase techniques (e.g., Chain of Thoughts) rely on prompt selection and the pretrained knowledge; sentence-level Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) struggle with step-wise mathematical correctness and depend on stronger models distillation or human annotations; while Reinforcement Learning (RL) approaches incur high GPU memory costs and unstable training. To address these, we propose \textbf{S}elf-training framework integrating \textbf{P}rocess \textbf{P}reference learning using \textbf{D}ynamic value margin (SPPD). SPPD leverages a process-based Markov Decision Process (MDP) and Bellman optimality equation to derive \textbf{dynamic value margin} on step-level preference optimization, which employs tree-based self-sampling on model responses \textbf{without any distillation} from other models. Furthermore, we theoretically prove that SPPD is \textbf{equivalent to on-policy policy gradient methods} under reward constraints. Experiments on 7B-scale models demonstrate superior performance across in-domain and out-domain mathematical benchmarks. We open-source our code at \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SSDPO-D-DCDD}{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SPPD-DCDD}.

Kaihui Chen, Hao Yi, Qingyang Li et al.

Enhancing the conformity of large language models (LLMs) to human preferences remains an ongoing research challenge. Recently, offline approaches such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have gained prominence as attractive options due to offering effective improvement in simple, efficient, and stable without interactions with reward models. However, these offline preference optimization methods highly rely on the quality of pairwise preference samples. Meanwhile, numerous iterative methods require additional training of reward models to select positive and negative samples from the model's own generated responses for preference learning. Furthermore, as LLMs' capabilities advance, it is quite challenging to continuously construct high-quality positive and negative preference instances from the model's outputs due to the lack of diversity. To tackle these challenges, we propose TSO, or Self-Training with Scaled Preference Optimization, a framework for preference optimization that conducts self-training preference learning without training an additional reward model. TSO enhances the diversity of responses by constructing a model matrix and incorporating human preference responses. Furthermore, TSO introduces corrections for model preference errors through human and AI feedback. Finally, TSO adopts iterative and dual clip reward strategies to update the reference model and its responses, adaptively adjusting preference data and balancing the optimization process. Experimental results demonstrate that TSO outperforms existing mainstream methods on various alignment evaluation benchmarks, providing practical insight into preference data construction and model training strategies in the alignment domain.

Yulan Hu, Qingyang Li, Sheng Ouyang et al.

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) facilitates the alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, thereby enhancing the quality of responses generated. A critical component of RLHF is the reward model, which is trained on preference data and outputs a scalar reward during the inference stage. However, the collection of preference data still lacks thorough investigation. Recent studies indicate that preference data is collected either by AI or humans, where chosen and rejected instances are identified among pairwise responses. We question whether this process effectively filters out noise and ensures sufficient diversity in collected data. To address these concerns, for the first time, we propose a comprehensive framework for preference data collection, decomposing the process into four incremental steps: Prompt Generation, Response Generation, Response Filtering, and Human Labeling. This structured approach ensures the collection of high-quality preferences while reducing reliance on human labor. We conducted comprehensive experiments based on the data collected at different stages, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed data collection method.