Lukas Theiner

Lukas Theiner, Maik Pfefferkorn, Yongpeng Zhao et al.

Tuning control policies manually to meet high-level objectives is often time-consuming. Bayesian optimization provides a data-efficient framework for automating this process using numerical evaluations of an objective function. However, many systems, particularly those involving humans, require optimization based on subjective criteria. Preferential Bayesian optimization addresses this by learning from pairwise comparisons instead of quantitative measurements, but relying solely on preference data can be inefficient. We propose a multi-fidelity, multi-modal Bayesian optimization framework that integrates low-fidelity numerical data with high-fidelity human preferences. Our approach employs Gaussian process surrogate models with both hierarchical, autoregressive and non-hierarchical, coregionalization-based structures, enabling efficient learning from mixed-modality data. We illustrate the framework by tuning an autonomous vehicle's trajectory planner, showing that combining numerical and preference data significantly reduces the need for experiments involving the human decision maker while effectively adapting driving style to individual preferences.

Alexander Rose, Lukas Theiner, Rolf Findeisen

Applying model predictive control on embedded systems remains challenging due to the high computational cost of solving optimal control problems. To address this limitation, computationally efficient Gaussian process approximations of the implicit model predictive control law can be employed. However, for trajectory-tracking applications, the large amount of training data required for successful generalization across distinct reference trajectories poses a significant challenge. To improve data efficiency, we propose to transform the model into curvilinear coordinates around the reference trajectory. Secondly, we use a nominal feedforward component, allowing the Gaussian process to learn only the residual control input, making the approximation of a trajectory-tracking controller feasible. To underline the applicability of the approach, we deploy the controller on a Raspberry Pi in a small-scale vehicle and validate it experimentally. Compared to a model predictive control implementation using real-time iterations, the Gaussian process based approximation computes control inputs about five times faster while achieving similar closed-loop tracking performance.

Hendrik Alsmeier, Lukas Theiner, Anton Savchenko et al.

This paper presents a framework for bounding the approximation error in imitation model predictive controllers utilizing neural networks. Leveraging the Lipschitz properties of these neural networks, we derive a bound that guides dataset design to ensure the approximation error remains at chosen limits. We discuss how this method can be used to design a stable neural network controller with performance guarantees employing existing robust model predictive control approaches for data generation. Additionally, we introduce a training adjustment, which is based on the sensitivities of the optimization problem and reduces dataset density requirements based on the derived bounds. We verify that the proposed augmentation results in improvements to the network's predictive capabilities and a reduction of the Lipschitz constant. Moreover, on a simulated inverted pendulum problem, we show that the approach results in a closer match of the closed-loop behavior between the imitation and the original model predictive controller.

Sebastian Hirt, Lukas Theiner, Rolf Findeisen

Closed-loop performance of sequential decision making algorithms, such as model predictive control, depends strongly on the choice of controller parameters. Bayesian optimization allows learning of parameters from closed-loop experiments, but standard Bayesian optimization treats this as a black-box problem and ignores the temporal structure of closed-loop trajectories, leading to slow convergence and inefficient use of experimental resources. We propose a time-series-informed multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization framework that aligns the fidelity dimension with closed-loop time, enabling intermediate performance evaluations within a closed-loop experiment to be incorporated as lower-fidelity observations. Additionally, we derive probabilistic early stopping criteria to terminate unpromising closed-loop experiments based on the surrogate model's posterior belief, avoiding full episodes for poor parameterizations and thereby reducing resource usage. Simulation results on a nonlinear control benchmark demonstrate that, compared to standard black-box Bayesian optimization approaches, the proposed method achieves comparable closed-loop performance with roughly half the experimental resources, and yields better final performance when using the same resource budget, highlighting the value of exploiting temporal structure for sample-efficient closed-loop controller tuning.

Sebastian Hirt, Lukas Theiner, Maik Pfefferkorn et al.

Many control problems require repeated tuning and adaptation of controllers across distinct closed-loop tasks, where data efficiency and adaptability are critical. We propose a hierarchical Bayesian optimization (BO) framework that is tailored to efficient controller parameter learning in sequential decision-making and control scenarios for distinct tasks. Instead of treating the closed-loop cost as a black-box, our method exploits structural knowledge of the underlying problem, consisting of a dynamical system, a control law, and an associated closed-loop cost function. We construct a hierarchical surrogate model using Gaussian processes that capture the closed-loop state evolution under different parameterizations, while the task-specific weighting and accumulation into the closed-loop cost are computed exactly via known closed-form expressions. This allows knowledge transfer and enhanced data efficiency between different closed-loop tasks. The proposed framework retains sublinear regret guarantees on par with standard black-box BO, while enabling multi-task or transfer learning. Simulation experiments with model predictive control demonstrate substantial benefits in both sample efficiency and adaptability when compared to purely black-box BO approaches.

Lukas Theiner, Sebastian Hirt, Alexander Steinke et al.

Trajectory planning for automated vehicles commonly employs optimization over a moving horizon - Model Predictive Control - where the cost function critically influences the resulting driving style. However, finding a suitable cost function that results in a driving style preferred by passengers remains an ongoing challenge. We employ preferential Bayesian optimization to learn the cost function by iteratively querying a passenger's preference. Due to increasing dimensionality of the parameter space, preference learning approaches might struggle to find a suitable optimum with a limited number of experiments and expose the passenger to discomfort when exploring the parameter space. We address these challenges by incorporating prior knowledge into the preferential Bayesian optimization framework. Our method constructs a virtual decision maker from real-world human driving data to guide parameter sampling. In a simulation experiment, we achieve faster convergence of the prior-knowledge-informed learning procedure compared to existing preferential Bayesian optimization approaches and reduce the number of inadequate driving styles sampled.