Varun Ursekar

2papers

2 Papers

AIFeb 25
VeRO: An Evaluation Harness for Agents to Optimize Agents

Varun Ursekar, Apaar Shanker, Veronica Chatrath et al.

An important emerging application of coding agents is agent optimization: the iterative improvement of a target agent through edit-execute-evaluate cycles. Despite its relevance, the community lacks a systematic understanding of coding agent performance on this task. Agent optimization differs fundamentally from conventional software engineering: the target agent interleaves deterministic code with stochastic LLM completions, requiring structured capture of both intermediate reasoning and downstream execution outcomes. To address these challenges, we introduce VERO (Versioning, Rewards, and Observations), which provides (1) a reproducible evaluation harness with versioned agent snapshots, budget-controlled evaluation, and structured execution traces, and (2) a benchmark suite of target agents and tasks with reference evaluation procedures. Using VERO, we conduct an empirical study comparing optimizer configurations across tasks and analyzing which modifications reliably improve target agent performance. We release VERO to support research on agent optimization as a core capability for coding agents.

NCJan 26, 2021
Predicting the future with a scale-invariant temporal memory for the past

Wei Zhong Goh, Varun Ursekar, Marc W. Howard

In recent years it has become clear that the brain maintains a temporal memory of recent events stretching far into the past. This paper presents a neurally-inspired algorithm to use a scale-invariant temporal representation of the past to predict a scale-invariant future. The result is a scale-invariant estimate of future events as a function of the time at which they are expected to occur. The algorithm is time-local, with credit assigned to the present event by observing how it affects the prediction of the future. To illustrate the potential utility of this approach, we test the model on simultaneous renewal processes with different time scales. The algorithm scales well on these problems despite the fact that the number of states needed to describe them as a Markov process grows exponentially.