Zafaryab Haider

Md Hafizur Rahman, Zafaryab Haider, Tanzim Mahfuz et al.

Multi-agent LLM systems decompose workflows across agents, tools, shared context, memory, and decision gates. This modularity improves interpretability, but creates a propagation risk: a bounded perturbation to one component can be reused by other agents and amplified into system-level harm. We introduce HARP (Harm Amplification through Role Perturbation), a trace-first methodology for studying local-to-global harm amplification in multi-agent LLM systems. HARP compares paired clean and perturbed executions and records specialist outputs, tool calls, memory reads/writes, guard events, oracle logs, latency, token cost, and decisions. We define local harm as deviation from targeted agents or corrupted channels, global harm as deviation over the full trace, and harm amplification as (H_global/H_local). This complements attack success rate with a measure of how strongly orchestration spreads harm beyond the attack point. We instantiate HARP in a finance-oriented seven-agent system with a deterministic decision gate and configurable attack harness for specialist compromise, collusion, shared-context corruption, and temporal or memory-persistent attacks. Across five defenses, prompt-only defenses preserve benign utility but leave high success and stealth; pre-tool and step-level guards reduce some failures with utility or latency costs; and IntegrityGuard, a trace-consistency defense, achieves the lowest attack success and global harm but introduces utility/cost trade-offs. Results show that single-specialist compromise produces the strongest amplification, shared-context corruption yields the highest attack success, and temporal persistence produces the largest malicious impact. HARP argues that secure multi-agent evaluation must measure not only bypass, but propagation.

Abdullah Al Nomaan Nafi, Habibur Rahaman, Zafaryab Haider et al.

Numerous techniques have been proposed for generating adversarial examples in white-box settings under strict Lp-norm constraints. However, such norm-bounded examples often fail to align well with human perception, and only recently have a few methods begun specifically exploring perceptually aligned adversarial examples. Moreover, it remains unclear whether insights from Lp-constrained attacks can be effectively leveraged to improve perceptual efficacy. In this paper, we introduce DAASH, a fully differentiable meta-attack framework that generates effective and perceptually aligned adversarial examples by strategically composing existing Lp-based attack methods. DAASH operates in a multi-stage fashion: at each stage, it aggregates candidate adversarial examples from multiple base attacks using learned, adaptive weights and propagates the result to the next stage. A novel meta-loss function guides this process by jointly minimizing misclassification loss and perceptual distortion, enabling the framework to dynamically modulate the contribution of each base attack throughout the stages. We evaluate DAASH on adversarially trained models across CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet. Despite relying solely on Lp-constrained based methods, DAASH significantly outperforms state-of-the-art perceptual attacks such as AdvAD -- achieving higher attack success rates (e.g., 20.63\% improvement) and superior visual quality, as measured by SSIM, LPIPS, and FID (improvements $\approx$ of 11, 0.015, and 5.7, respectively). Furthermore, DAASH generalizes well to unseen defenses, making it a practical and strong baseline for evaluating robustness without requiring handcrafted adaptive attacks for each new defense.