Dehao Huang

Dehao Huang, Aoxiang Gu, Chengjie Zhang et al.

Confidence estimation for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models is essential for robots to perform manipulation tasks in the open world, providing crucial signals for risk-sensitive decision-making and failure anticipation. Existing confidence estimation methods typically rely on ensemble-based paradigms or action-token probabilities to predict the likelihood of task success. However, they still encounter challenges in computational efficiency and cross-architecture generalizability. These methods usually require repeated sampling, leading to inference inefficiency, and are restricted to VLA models with discrete action outputs, making them difficult to apply to continuous action spaces. To address this issue, we propose VLAConf, a one-class discriminative confidence framework. By leveraging frozen pretrained VLA internal representations, VLAConf directly estimates step-wise anomaly scores in a single forward pass using a lightweight confidence head, thereby eliminating the overhead of exhaustive resampling. We additionally use step-conditioned modeling to encode rollout-phase information along the manipulation trajectory. Experiments on the LIBERO benchmark demonstrate that VLAConf significantly improves the quality of the confidence signal constructed for post-hoc calibration, outperforming existing baselines by a large margin in inference efficiency. The effectiveness of VLAConf is further validated in real-robot experiments. To access the source code and supplementary videos, visit https://sites.google.com/view/vlaconf.

Hexuan Deng, Xiaopeng Ke, Yichen Li et al.

Despite the rapid development of AI reviewers, evaluating such systems remains challenging: metrics favor overlap with human reviews over correctness. However, since human reviews often cover only a subset of salient issues and sometimes contain mistakes, they are unreliable as gold references. To address this, we build category-specific benchmark subsets and skip evaluation when the corresponding human reviews are missing to strengthen Completeness. We also leverage reviewer--author--meta-review discussions as expert annotations and filter unreliable reviews accordingly to strengthen Correctness. Finally, we introduce CoCoReviewBench, which curates 3,900 papers from ICLR and NeurIPS to enable reliable and fine-grained evaluation of AI reviewers. Analysis shows that AI reviewers remain limited in correctness and are prone to hallucinations, and highlights reasoning models as more effective reviewers, motivating further directions for improving AI reviewers. Benchmarks and models are available at https://github.com/hexuandeng/CoCoReviewBench.

Chengjie Zhang, Chao Tang, Wenlong Dong et al.

Interactive Imitation Learning (IIL) typically relies on extensive human involvement for both offline demonstration and online interaction. Prior work primarily focuses on reducing human effort in passive monitoring rather than active operation. Interestingly, structured model-based imitation approaches achieve comparable performance with significantly fewer demonstrations than end-to-end imitation learning policies in the low-data regime. However, these methods are typically surpassed by end-to-end policies as the data increases. Leveraging this insight, we propose Easy-IIL, a framework that utilizes off-the-shelf model-based imitation methods as an assistant expert to replace active human operation for the majority of data collection. The human expert only provides a single demonstration to initialize the assistant expert and intervenes in critical states where the task is approaching failure. Furthermore, Easy-IIL can maintain IIL performance by preserving both offline and online data quality. Extensive simulation and real-world experiments demonstrate that Easy-IIL significantly reduces human operational burden while maintaining performance comparable to mainstream IIL baselines. User studies further confirm that Easy-IIL reduces subjective workload on the human expert. Project page: https://sites.google.com/view/easy-iil

Chenyang Shao, Dehao Huang, Yu Li et al.

With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), AI agents have demonstrated increasing proficiency in scientific tasks, ranging from hypothesis generation and experimental design to manuscript writing. Such agent systems are commonly referred to as "AI Scientists." However, existing AI Scientists predominantly formulate scientific discovery as a standalone search or optimization problem, overlooking the fact that scientific research is inherently a social and collaborative endeavor. Real-world science relies on a complex scientific infrastructure composed of collaborative mechanisms, contribution attribution, peer review, and structured scientific knowledge networks. Due to the lack of modeling for these critical dimensions, current systems struggle to establish a genuine research ecosystem or interact deeply with the human scientific community. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniScientist, a framework that explicitly encodes the underlying mechanisms of human research into the AI scientific workflow. OmniScientist not only achieves end-to-end automation across data foundation, literature review, research ideation, experiment automation, scientific writing, and peer review, but also provides comprehensive infrastructural support by simulating the human scientific system, comprising: (1) a structured knowledge system built upon citation networks and conceptual correlations; (2) a collaborative research protocol (OSP), which enables seamless multi-agent collaboration and human researcher participation; and (3) an open evaluation platform (ScienceArena) based on blind pairwise user voting and Elo rankings. This infrastructure empowers agents to not only comprehend and leverage human knowledge systems but also to collaborate and co-evolve, fostering a sustainable and scalable innovation ecosystem.

Dehao Huang, Jintao Cheng, Rui Fan et al.

For a long time, bone marrow cell morphology examination has been an essential tool for diagnosing blood diseases. However, it is still mainly dependent on the subjective diagnosis of experienced doctors, and there is no objective quantitative standard. Therefore, it is crucial to study a robust bone marrow cell detection algorithm for a quantitative automatic analysis system. Currently, due to the dense distribution of cells in the bone marrow smear and the diverse cell classes, the detection of bone marrow cells is difficult. The existing bone marrow cell detection algorithms are still insufficient for the automatic analysis system of bone marrow smears. This paper proposes a bone marrow cell detection algorithm based on the YOLOv5 network, trained by minimizing a novel loss function. The classification method of bone marrow cell detection tasks is the basis of the proposed novel loss function. Since bone marrow cells are classified according to series and stages, part of the classes in adjacent stages are similar. The proposed novel loss function considers the similarity between bone marrow cell classes, increases the penalty for prediction errors between dissimilar classes, and reduces the penalty for prediction errors between similar classes. The results show that the proposed loss function effectively improves the algorithm's performance, and the proposed bone marrow cell detection algorithm has achieved better performance than other cell detection algorithms.