Ruotong Zhao

Ruotong Zhao, Shaokang Hu, Deepak Mishra et al.

In this work, we investigate a blockage-aware pinching antenna (PA) system designed for secure and robust wireless communication. The considered system comprises a base station equipped with multiple waveguides, each hosting multiple PAs, and serves multiple single-antenna legitimate users in the presence of multi-antenna eavesdroppers under imperfect channel state information (CSI). To safeguard confidential transmissions, artificial noise (AN) is deliberately injected to degrade the eavesdropping channels. Recognizing that conventional linear CSI error bounds become overly conservative for spatially distributed PA architectures, we develop new geometry aware uncertainty sets that jointly characterize eavesdropper position and array-orientation errors. Building upon these sets, we formulate a robust joint optimization problem that determines per waveguide beamforming and AN covariance, individual PA power ratio allocation, and PA positions to maximize the system sum rate subject to secrecy constraints. The highly nonconvex design problem is efficiently addressed via a low computational complexity iterative algorithm that capitalizes on block coordinate descent, penalty based methods, majorization minimization, the S procedure, and Lipschitz based surrogate functions. Simulation results demonstrate that the sum rate achieved by the proposed algorithm outperforms conventional fixed-antenna systems by 4.7 dB, offering substantially improved rate and secrecy performance. In particular, (i) adaptive PA positioning preserves LoS to legitimate users while effectively exploiting waveguide geometry to disrupt eavesdropper channels, and (ii) neglecting blockage effects in the PA system significantly impacts the system design, leading to performance degradation and inadequate secrecy guarantees.

Yu Li, Chenyang Shao, Xinyang Liu et al.

Artificial intelligence research increasingly depends on prolonged cycles of reproduction, debugging, and iterative refinement to achieve State-Of-The-Art (SOTA) performance, creating a growing need for systems that can accelerate the full pipeline of empirical model optimization. In this work, we introduce AutoSOTA, an end-to-end automated research system that advances the latest SOTA models published in top-tier AI papers to reproducible and empirically improved new SOTA models. We formulate this problem through three tightly coupled stages: resource preparation and goal setting; experiment evaluation; and reflection and ideation. To tackle this problem, AutoSOTA adopts a multi-agent architecture with eight specialized agents that collaboratively ground papers to code and dependencies, initialize and repair execution environments, track long-horizon experiments, generate and schedule optimization ideas, and supervise validity to avoid spurious gains. We evaluate AutoSOTA on recent research papers collected from eight top-tier AI conferences under filters for code availability and execution cost. Across these papers, AutoSOTA achieves strong end-to-end performance in both automated replication and subsequent optimization. Specifically, it successfully discovers 105 new SOTA models that surpass the original reported methods, averaging approximately five hours per paper. Case studies spanning LLM, NLP, computer vision, time series, and optimization further show that the system can move beyond routine hyperparameter tuning to identify architectural innovation, algorithmic redesigns, and workflow-level improvements. These results suggest that end-to-end research automation can serve not only as a performance optimizer, but also as a new form of research infrastructure that reduces repetitive experimental burden and helps redirect human attention toward higher-level scientific creativity.

Chenyang Shao, Dehao Huang, Yu Li et al.

With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), AI agents have demonstrated increasing proficiency in scientific tasks, ranging from hypothesis generation and experimental design to manuscript writing. Such agent systems are commonly referred to as "AI Scientists." However, existing AI Scientists predominantly formulate scientific discovery as a standalone search or optimization problem, overlooking the fact that scientific research is inherently a social and collaborative endeavor. Real-world science relies on a complex scientific infrastructure composed of collaborative mechanisms, contribution attribution, peer review, and structured scientific knowledge networks. Due to the lack of modeling for these critical dimensions, current systems struggle to establish a genuine research ecosystem or interact deeply with the human scientific community. To bridge this gap, we introduce OmniScientist, a framework that explicitly encodes the underlying mechanisms of human research into the AI scientific workflow. OmniScientist not only achieves end-to-end automation across data foundation, literature review, research ideation, experiment automation, scientific writing, and peer review, but also provides comprehensive infrastructural support by simulating the human scientific system, comprising: (1) a structured knowledge system built upon citation networks and conceptual correlations; (2) a collaborative research protocol (OSP), which enables seamless multi-agent collaboration and human researcher participation; and (3) an open evaluation platform (ScienceArena) based on blind pairwise user voting and Elo rankings. This infrastructure empowers agents to not only comprehend and leverage human knowledge systems but also to collaborate and co-evolve, fostering a sustainable and scalable innovation ecosystem.