Rodrigo Wilkens

Joseph Marvin Imperial, Junhong Liang, Belal Shoer et al.

When a text is translated, does the translation retain the complexity of the original? We introduce ComplexityMT, a new challenge for assessing how text complexity and machine translation interact with and influence each other, using the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) levels as the measure of text complexity. Across six languages, including Arabic, Dutch, English, French, Hindi, and Russian, we evaluate three open-weight models, one closed model, and a commercial machine translation system on two tasks: i) correlation of CEFR with translation difficulty, and ii) shifts in CEFR levels of the source texts. Our experiments show that higher CEFR levels make texts more difficult to translate, and that machine translation shifts the CEFR level of the target text compared to the original source, for most languages. These findings provide new insights for researchers and practitioners working on multilingual pedagogical content generation and machine translation difficulty estimation.

Rodrigo Wilkens, Rémi Cardon, Vincent Folny et al.

In Automated Essay Scoring (AES), benchmarking practices have fostered minimalist evaluation practices, in contrast with the broader-view recommendations of evaluation frameworks, such as the argument-based validation framework (ABV), which argued in favor of a multidimensional assessment of systems, especially in the context of high-stakes language tests. In this paper, we introduce an enhanced and more practical version of the ABV framework, incorporating fairness analysis, correlations with linguistic features, prediction error evaluation, and model agreement compared with human raters. Applying this framework to French AES, we compare 8 model architectures on a corpus of 27k exam essays (2 raters each) and a generalization corpus of 961 essays (at least nine raters each). Our analyses illustrate the benefits of applying the ABV framework to better understand the capabilities and pitfalls of AES models, while also advancing the state-of-the-art for French AES.

Dilara Torunoğlu-Selamet, Dogukan Arslan, Rodrigo Wilkens et al.

Potentially idiomatic expressions (PIEs) construe meanings inherently tied to the everyday experience of a given language community. As such, they constitute an interesting challenge for assessing the linguistic (and to some extent cultural) capabilities of NLP systems. In this paper, we present XMPIE, a parallel multilingual and multimodal dataset of potentially idiomatic expressions. The dataset, containing 34 languages and over ten thousand items, allows comparative analyses of idiomatic patterns among language-specific realisations and preferences in order to gather insights about shared cultural aspects. This parallel dataset allows to evaluate model performance for a given PIE in different languages and whether idiomatic understanding in one language can be transferred to another. Moreover, the dataset supports the study of PIEs across textual and visual modalities, to measure to what extent PIE understanding in one modality transfers or implies in understanding in another modality (text vs. image). The data was created by language experts, with both textual and visual components crafted under multilingual guidelines, and each PIE is accompanied by five images representing a spectrum from idiomatic to literal meanings, including semantically related and random distractors. The result is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating multilingual and multimodal idiomatic language understanding.

Dylan Phelps, Rodrigo Wilkens, Edward Gow-Smith et al.

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative condition that adversely affects cognitive abilities. Language-related changes can be automatically identified through the analysis of outputs from linguistic assessment tasks, such as picture description. Language models show promise as a basis for screening tools for AD, but their limited interpretability poses a challenge in distinguishing true linguistic markers of cognitive decline from surface-level textual patterns. To address this issue, we examine how surface form variation affects classification performance, with the goal of assessing the ability of language models to represent underlying semantic indicators. We introduce a novel approach where texts surface forms are transformed by altering syntax and vocabulary while preserving semantic content. The transformations significantly modify the structure and lexical content, as indicated by low BLEU and chrF scores, yet retain the underlying semantics, as reflected in high semantic similarity scores, isolating the effect of semantic information, and finding models perform similarly to if they were using the original text, with only small deviations in macro-F1. We also investigate whether language from picture descriptions retains enough detail to reconstruct the original image using generative models. We found that image-based transformations add substantial noise reducing classification accuracy. Our methodology provides a novel way of looking at what features influence model predictions, and allows the removal of possible spurious correlations. We find that just using semantic information, language model based classifiers can still detect AD. This work shows that difficult to detect semantic impairment can be identified, addressing an overlooked feature of linguistic deterioration, and opening new pathways for early detection systems.

Marina Ribeiro, Bárbara Malcorra, Natália B. Mota et al.

Neurological disorders that affect speech production, such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD), significantly impact the lives of both patients and caregivers, whether through social, psycho-emotional effects or other aspects not yet fully understood. Recent advancements in Large Language Model (LLM) architectures have developed many tools to identify representative features of neurological disorders through spontaneous speech. However, LLMs typically lack interpretability, meaning they do not provide clear and specific reasons for their decisions. Therefore, there is a need for methods capable of identifying the representative features of neurological disorders in speech and explaining clearly why these features are relevant. This paper presents an explainable LLM method, named SLIME (Statistical and Linguistic Insights for Model Explanation), capable of identifying lexical components representative of AD and indicating which components are most important for the LLM's decision. In developing this method, we used an English-language dataset consisting of transcriptions from the Cookie Theft picture description task. The LLM Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) classified the textual descriptions as either AD or control groups. To identify representative lexical features and determine which are most relevant to the model's decision, we used a pipeline involving Integrated Gradients (IG), Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), and statistical analysis. Our method demonstrates that BERT leverages lexical components that reflect a reduction in social references in AD and identifies which further improve the LLM's accuracy. Thus, we provide an explainability tool that enhances confidence in applying LLMs to neurological clinical contexts, particularly in the study of neurodegeneration.

Dylan Phelps, Rodrigo Wilkens, Edward Gow-Smith et al.

The recent trend towards utilisation of reasoning models has improved the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) across many tasks which involve logical steps. One linguistic task that could benefit from this framing is idiomaticity detection, as a potentially idiomatic expression must first be understood before it can be disambiguated and serves as a basis for reasoning. In this paper, we explore how reasoning capabilities in LLMs affect idiomaticity detection performance and examine the effect of model size. We evaluate, as open source representative models, the suite of DeepSeek-R1 distillation models ranging from 1.5B to 70B parameters across four idiomaticity detection datasets. We find the effect of reasoning to be smaller and more varied than expected. For smaller models, producing chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning increases performance from Math-tuned intermediate models, but not to the levels of the base models, whereas larger models (14B, 32B, and 70B) show modest improvements. Our in-depth analyses reveal that larger models demonstrate good understanding of idiomaticity, successfully producing accurate definitions of expressions, while smaller models often fail to output the actual meaning. For this reason, we also experiment with providing definitions in the prompts of smaller models, which we show can improve performance in some cases.

Joseph Marvin Imperial, Abdullah Barayan, Regina Stodden et al.

We introduce UniversalCEFR, a large-scale multilingual and multidimensional dataset of texts annotated with CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference) levels in 13 languages. To enable open research in automated readability and language proficiency assessment, UniversalCEFR comprises 505,807 CEFR-labeled texts curated from educational and learner-oriented resources, standardized into a unified data format to support consistent processing, analysis, and modelling across tasks and languages. To demonstrate its utility, we conduct benchmarking experiments using three modelling paradigms: a) linguistic feature-based classification, b) fine-tuning pre-trained LLMs, and c) descriptor-based prompting of instruction-tuned LLMs. Our results support using linguistic features and fine-tuning pretrained models in multilingual CEFR level assessment. Overall, UniversalCEFR aims to establish best practices in data distribution for language proficiency research by standardising dataset formats, and promoting their accessibility to the global research community.

Rodrigo Wilkens, Leonardo Zilio, Aline Villavicencio

Much recent effort has been devoted to creating large-scale language models. Nowadays, the most prominent approaches are based on deep neural networks, such as BERT. However, they lack transparency and interpretability, and are often seen as black boxes. This affects not only their applicability in downstream tasks but also the comparability of different architectures or even of the same model trained using different corpora or hyperparameters. In this paper, we propose a set of intrinsic evaluation tasks that inspect the linguistic information encoded in models developed for Brazilian Portuguese. These tasks are designed to evaluate how different language models generalise information related to grammatical structures and multiword expressions (MWEs), thus allowing for an assessment of whether the model has learned different linguistic phenomena. The dataset that was developed for these tasks is composed of a series of sentences with a single masked word and a cue phrase that helps in narrowing down the context. This dataset is divided into MWEs and grammatical structures, and the latter is subdivided into 6 tasks: impersonal verbs, subject agreement, verb agreement, nominal agreement, passive and connectors. The subset for MWEs was used to test BERTimbau Large, BERTimbau Base and mBERT. For the grammatical structures, we used only BERTimbau Large, because it yielded the best results in the MWE task.