13.3AIAug 22, 2024
Bridging Large Language Models and Optimization: A Unified Framework for Text-attributed Combinatorial OptimizationXia Jiang, Yaoxin Wu, Yuan Wang et al.
To advance capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs), this paper presents the Language-based Neural COP Solver (LNCS), a novel framework that is unified for the end-to-end resolution of diverse text-attributed COPs. LNCS leverages LLMs to encode problem instances into a unified semantic space, and integrates their embeddings with a Transformer-based solution generator to produce high-quality solutions. By training the solution generator with conflict-free multi-task reinforcement learning, LNCS effectively enhances LLM performance in tackling COPs of varying types and sizes, achieving state-of-the-art results across diverse problems. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness and generalizability of the LNCS, highlighting its potential as a unified and practical framework for real-world COP applications.
24.3AISep 21, 2025
Large Language Models as End-to-end Combinatorial Optimization SolversXia Jiang, Yaoxin Wu, Minshuo Li et al.
Combinatorial optimization (CO) problems, central to decision-making scenarios like logistics and manufacturing, are traditionally solved using problem-specific algorithms requiring significant domain expertise. While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in automating CO problem solving, existing approaches rely on intermediate steps such as code generation or solver invocation, limiting their generality and accessibility. This paper introduces a novel framework that empowers LLMs to serve as end-to-end CO solvers by directly mapping natural language problem descriptions to solutions. We propose a two-stage training strategy: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) imparts LLMs with solution generation patterns from domain-specific solvers, while a feasibility-and-optimality-aware reinforcement learning (FOARL) process explicitly mitigates constraint violations and refines solution quality. Evaluation across seven NP-hard CO problems shows that our method achieves a high feasibility rate and reduces the average optimality gap to 1.03-8.20% by tuning a 7B-parameter LLM, surpassing both general-purpose LLMs (e.g., GPT-4o), reasoning models (e.g., DeepSeek-R1), and domain-specific heuristics. Our method establishes a unified language-based pipeline for CO without extensive code execution or manual architectural adjustments for different problems, offering a general and language-driven alternative to traditional solver design while maintaining relative feasibility guarantees.