Karan Uppal

CV
6papers
24citations
Novelty30%
AI Score41

6 Papers

CVNov 20, 2022
Decoding Attention from Gaze: A Benchmark Dataset and End-to-End Models

Karan Uppal, Jaeah Kim, Shashank Singh

Eye-tracking has potential to provide rich behavioral data about human cognition in ecologically valid environments. However, analyzing this rich data is often challenging. Most automated analyses are specific to simplistic artificial visual stimuli with well-separated, static regions of interest, while most analyses in the context of complex visual stimuli, such as most natural scenes, rely on laborious and time-consuming manual annotation. This paper studies using computer vision tools for "attention decoding", the task of assessing the locus of a participant's overt visual attention over time. We provide a publicly available Multiple Object Eye-Tracking (MOET) dataset, consisting of gaze data from participants tracking specific objects, annotated with labels and bounding boxes, in crowded real-world videos, for training and evaluating attention decoding algorithms. We also propose two end-to-end deep learning models for attention decoding and compare these to state-of-the-art heuristic methods.

CVMay 21
Swift Sampling: Selecting Temporal Surprises via Taylor Series

Dahye Kim, Bhuvan Sachdeva, Karan Uppal et al.

While most frames in long-form video are redundant, the critical information resides in temporal surprises: moments where the actual visual features deviate from their predicted evolution. Inspired by the human brain's predictive coding, we introduce Swift Sampling, an elegant, training-free frame selection algorithm that automatically identifies high-information moments in a video. Specifically, we model a video as a differentiable trajectory in the visual latent space and compute the velocity and acceleration of its features. Then, we apply Taylor expansion to project the expected path of subsequent frames. Frames that diverge sharply from this predicted manifold are identified as temporally surprising frames and selected for sampling. Unlike prior training-free methods that rely on auxiliary networks or video-specific hyperparameter tuning, Swift Sampling is incredibly lightweight, adding only 0.02x additional computational cost over baseline making it 30x cheaper overhead than leading baselines. Across three long-video question answering benchmarks and 10 different downstream tasks, Swift Sampling outperforms uniform sampling and prior query-agnostic baselines. It is especially powerful for long videos with limited frame budgets improving accuracy by up to +12.5 points.

CVApr 30, 2021Code
Reproducibility of "FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation forSemantic Segmentation

Arnesh Kumar Issar, Kirtan Mali, Aryan Mehta et al.

The following paper is a reproducibility report for "FDA: Fourier Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation" published in the CVPR 2020 as part of the ML Reproducibility Challenge 2020. The original code was made available by the author. The well-commented version of the code containing all ablation studies performed derived from the original code along with WANDB integration is available at <github.com/thefatbandit/FDA> with proper instructions to execute experiments in README.

CLApr 19, 2019Code
Suggestion Mining from Online Reviews using ULMFiT

Sarthak Anand, Debanjan Mahata, Kartik Aggarwal et al.

In this paper we present our approach and the system description for Sub Task A of SemEval 2019 Task 9: Suggestion Mining from Online Reviews and Forums. Given a sentence, the task asks to predict whether the sentence consists of a suggestion or not. Our model is based on Universal Language Model Fine-tuning for Text Classification. We apply various pre-processing techniques before training the language and the classification model. We further provide detailed analysis of the results obtained using the trained model. Our team ranked 10th out of 34 participants, achieving an F1 score of 0.7011. We publicly share our implementation at https://github.com/isarth/SemEval9_MIDAS

CVNov 24, 2025
Understanding Task Transfer in Vision-Language Models

Bhuvan Sachdeva, Karan Uppal, Abhinav Java et al.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) perform well on multimodal benchmarks but lag behind humans and specialized models on visual perception tasks like depth estimation or object counting. Finetuning on one task can unpredictably affect performance on others, making task-specific finetuning challenging. In this paper, we address this challenge through a systematic study of task transferability. We examine how finetuning a VLM on one perception task affects its zero-shot performance on others. To quantify these effects, we introduce Perfection Gap Factor (PGF), a metric that captures both the breadth and magnitude of transfer. Using three open-weight VLMs evaluated across 13 perception tasks, we construct a task-transfer graph that reveals previously unobserved relationships among perception tasks. Our analysis uncovers patterns of positive and negative transfer, identifies groups of tasks that mutually influence each other, organizes tasks into personas based on their transfer behavior and demonstrates how PGF can guide data selection for more efficient training. These findings highlight both opportunities for positive transfer and risks of negative interference, offering actionable guidance for advancing VLMs.

CLApr 19, 2019
Identifying Offensive Posts and Targeted Offense from Twitter

Haimin Zhang, Debanjan Mahata, Simra Shahid et al.

In this paper we present our approach and the system description for Sub-task A and Sub Task B of SemEval 2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media. Sub-task A involves identifying if a given tweet is offensive or not, and Sub Task B involves detecting if an offensive tweet is targeted towards someone (group or an individual). Our models for Sub-task A is based on an ensemble of Convolutional Neural Network, Bidirectional LSTM with attention, and Bidirectional LSTM + Bidirectional GRU, whereas for Sub-task B, we rely on a set of heuristics derived from the training data and manual observation. We provide detailed analysis of the results obtained using the trained models. Our team ranked 5th out of 103 participants in Sub-task A, achieving a macro F1 score of 0.807, and ranked 8th out of 75 participants in Sub Task B achieving a macro F1 of 0.695.