Keshav Bulia

Shubhankit Singh, Hassan Shaikh, Kuldeep Raghuwanshi et al.

Automated ASD screening tools remain limited by single-architecture evaluations, axis-restricted assessment, and near-exclusive focus on adult cohorts, obscuring age-specific diagnostic patterns critical for early intervention. We introduce ASD-Bench, a systematic tabular benchmark evaluating ML, deep learning, and foundation model configurations across three age cohorts (children 1-11 yr, adolescents 12-16 yr, adults 17-64 yr) on four axes: predictive performance, calibration, interpretability, and adversarial robustness. Applied to a curated v3 dataset of 4,068 AQ-10 records, our benchmark spans classical models (XGBoost, AdaBoost, Random Forest, Logistic Regression), neural networks (MLP), deep tabular transformers (TabNet, TabTransformer, FT-Transformer), and TabPFN v2. We introduce the Heuristic Aggregate Penalty (HAP): a cost-sensitive metric penalising false negatives more heavily and incorporating cross-validation variance for deployment stability. Adult classification yields high performance (10/17 models achieve perfect F1 and AUC), while adolescents present a harder task (F1 ceiling 0.837 vs. 0.915 for children). Feature hierarchies shift across cohorts: A9 (social motivation) dominates for children, A5 (pattern recognition) leads for adolescents, and adults exhibit a flatter importance profile consistent with developmental social masking. Accuracy and calibration are dissociated: AdaBoost achieves F1=1.000 on adults with ECE=0.302, confirming single-metric evaluation is insufficient for clinical AI. Cohort-specific deployment recommendations are provided. All findings should be interpreted as proof-of-concept evidence on questionnaire-derived labels rather than clinically validated diagnostic performance.

Souradeep Dutta, Keshav Bulia, Neena S Nair

Facebook AI Research introduced KRISP [4], which integrates structured external knowledge into pipelines for vision-language reasoning. Despite its effectiveness, the original model has been developed for industrial-scale training, is computationally demanding, and is tightly connected to a large backbone. In this work, we reexamine KRISP from a different angle and offer a lightweight reproduction with significantly fewer parameters. Even though our replicated model performs about 75 % of the original, the replication process uncovers a number of design flaws, real-world pitfalls, and implicit problems that were not fully covered in the original paper. We offer insights into the scalability and efficacy of knowledge-enhanced VQA architectures under resource constraints through systematic ablation studies, which include a proof-of-concept on synthetic VQA data and evaluation on the DAQUAR dataset. Our model, configured with a low parameter setup and constrained by the external Knowledge graph domain, prevents AI hallucinations and generates outputs solely within that domain. Minimal parameters allow us to function on edge devices like smartphones and AR-VR, further improving offline visual reasoning.