Dennis Eisermann

Jonas Wessner, Tobias Meuser, Janek Schoffit et al.

Configuring network access control policies in large, complex networks is error-prone and requires significant expert effort. LLMs offer a promising interface for expressing such policies in natural language, but their capability for translating user requests into access policies, and the system architectures best suited to leverage LLMs, remain underexplored. We present an architecture for natural-language access control (NLAC) that uses LLMs to translate user requests into access policies, and introduce NLACBench, a benchmark for evaluating LLM-based intent translation systems in large-scale networks. Our evaluation across multiple state-of-the-art models shows that top-performing LLMs achieve up to 96.9% accuracy in small-network settings, but performance degrades substantially (below 20% for some models) as network size increases. To address this limitation, we identify relevant network components via embedding similarity and construct compact subgraphs that are passed to the LLM. This approach enables scaling to larger networks with up to 98.7% accuracy, while simultaneously reducing inference time, hardware requirements, and operating costs to a constant resource budget. Finally, a case study indicates that top-performing models exhibit largely complementary error patterns, suggesting that intent translation accuracy may be further improved through multi-LLM architectures.

Koffi Ismael Ouattara, Ioannis Krontiris, Theo Dimitrakos et al.

Trustworthiness has become a key requirement for the deployment of artificial intelligence systems in safety-critical applications. Conventional evaluation metrics, such as accuracy and precision, fail to appropriately capture uncertainty or the reliability of model predictions, particularly under adversarial or degraded conditions. This paper introduces the Parallel Trust Assessment System (PaTAS), a framework for modeling and propagating trust in neural networks using Subjective Logic (SL). PaTAS operates in parallel with standard neural computation through Trust Nodes and Trust Functions that propagate input, parameter, and activation trust across the network. The framework defines a Parameter Trust Update mechanism to refine parameter reliability during training and an Inference-Path Trust Assessment (IPTA) method to compute instance-specific trust at inference. Experiments on real-world and adversarial datasets demonstrate that PaTAS produces interpretable, symmetric, and convergent trust estimates that complement accuracy and expose reliability gaps in poisoned, biased, or uncertain data scenarios. The results show that PaTAS effectively distinguishes between benign and adversarial inputs and identifies cases where model confidence diverges from actual reliability. By enabling transparent and quantifiable trust reasoning within neural architectures, PaTAS provides a foundation for evaluating model reliability across the AI lifecycle.