M. E. A. Kherchouche

M. E. A. Kherchouche, F. Galpin, T. Dumas et al.

The Versatile Video Coding (VVC) standard, introduced in 2020, offers 40-50% bitrate savings for equivalent visual quality of reconstructed videos over its predecessor, High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), at the cost of significantly increased encoding complexity. This growth in encoding complexity is mainly due to the addition of the Quad Tree Multi Type Tree (QTMTT) partitioning structure, which increases the split combinatorial complexity. This paper presents a critical evaluation of state-of-the-art (SOTA) partitioning acceleration techniques designed to reduce the complexity of the partitioning search in VVC. Particular attention is given to how these methods have evolved alongside successive versions of the VVC Test Model (VTM), which serves as the reference software for benchmarking coding tools. These techniques are analyzed in the context of their adaptation to internal changes in VTM, such as updated heuristics for fast partitioning decisions. The study also highlights the challenges involved in improving the trade-off between encoding complexity and compression efficiency. This challenge becomes more pronounced when evaluating methods across diverse VTM configurations and multiple software versions.

M. E. A. Kherchouche, F. Galpin, T. Dumas et al.

In this paper, a complexity study is conducted for Versatile Video Codec (VVC) intra partitioning to accelerate the exhaustive search involved in Rate-Distortion Optimization (RDO) process. To address this problem, two main machine learning techniques are proposed and compared. Unlike existing methods, the proposed approaches are size independent and incorporate the Rate-Distortion (RD) costs of neighboring blocks as input features. The first method is a regression based technique that predicts normalized RD costs of a given Coding Unit (CU). As partitioning possesses the Markov property, the associated decision-making problem can be modeled as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and solved by Reinforcement Learning (RL). The second approach is a RL agent learned from trajectories of CU decision across two depths with Deep Q-Network (DQN) algorithm. Then a pre-determined thresholds are applied for both methods to select a suitable split for the current CU.