Felix Leitenberger

Nehal Afifi, Abdelmonem Elhendawi, Felix Leitenberger et al.

Electro-Hydrostatic Actuators (EHAs) are widely used in aerospace and industrial systems, where timely detection of sensor anomalies is essential to ensure safe and reliable operation. However, the large volume and high sampling frequency of EHA sensor data pose challenges for accurate and efficient anomaly detection. Conventional statistical and classical machine-learning methods such as Z-score, Interquartile Range (IQR), Median Absolute Deviation (MAD), Isolation Forest, Gaussian Mixture, and k-means often fail to capture the temporal dependencies inherent in EHA signals, resulting in limited detection accuracy and elevated false-alarm rates. Furthermore, systematic evaluations of data-driven anomaly detection approaches for EHA systems remain scarce, particularly under varying operational conditions. This study presents an offline anomaly-detection framework for univariate EHA sensor signals, focusing on temperature and pressure data collected from a controlled test bench. The method employs a reconstruction-based Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) autoencoder, calibrated and evaluated using validation-set reconstruction-error distributions. Performance is assessed across multiple fault-injection scenarios using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score, complemented by sensitivity analyses under varying operating conditions. The LSTM autoencoder achieved an average accuracy of 99.0\%, precision up to 100\%, recall between 90.2\% and 99.6\%, and F1-scores from 93.1\% to 99.8\%, demonstrating high detection sensitivity and a very low false-alarm rate across all evaluated sensors. These results highlight the feasibility of data-driven offline anomaly detection for EHAs. Future work will focus on adapting the developed framework for an online (real-time) environment.

Nehal Afifi, Christoph Wittig, Lukas Paehler et al.

The increasing availability of data and advancements in computational intelligence have accelerated the adoption of data-driven methods (DDMs) in product development. However, their integration into product development remains fragmented. This fragmentation stems from uncertainty, particularly the lack of clarity on what types of DDMs to use and when to employ them across the product development lifecycle. To address this, a necessary first step is to investigate the usage of DDM in engineering design by identifying which methods are being used, at which development stages, and for what application. This paper presents a PRISMA systematic literature review. The V-model as a product development framework was adopted and simplified into four stages: system design, system implementation, system integration, and validation. A structured search across Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore (2014--2024) retrieved 1{,}689 records. After screening, 114 publications underwent full-text analysis. Findings show that machine learning (ML) and statistical methods dominate current practice, whereas deep learning (DL), though still less common, exhibits a clear upward trend in adoption. Additionally, supervised learning, clustering, regression analysis, and surrogate modeling are prevalent in design, implementation, and integration system stages but contributions to validation remain limited. Key challenges in existing applications include limited model interpretability, poor cross-stage traceability, and insufficient validation under real-world conditions. Additionally, it highlights key limitations and opportunities such as the need for interpretable hybrid models. This review is a first step toward design-stage guidelines; a follow-up synthesis should map computer science algorithms to engineering design problems and activities.