Tengyao Tu

Runwen You, Tong Xia, Jingzhi Wang et al.

Urban data support a wide range of applications across multiple disciplines. However, at the global scale, there is no unified platform for urban data discovery. As a result, researchers often have to manually search through websites or scientific literature to identify relevant datasets. To address this problem, we curate an open urban data discovery portal, \textit{UrbanDataMiner}, which supports dataset-level search and filtering over more than 60{,}000 urban datasets extracted from over 15{,}000 Nature-affiliated publications. \textit{UrbanDataMiner} is enabled by \textit{Paper2Data}, a novel large-scale LLM-driven pipeline that automatically identifies dataset mentions in scientific papers and structures them using a unified urban data metadata schema. Human-annotated evaluation demonstrates that \textit{Paper2Data} achieves high recall (approximately 90\%) in dataset identification and high field-level precision (above 80\%). In addition, \textit{UrbanDataMiner} can retrieve over 9\% of datasets that are not easily discoverable through general-purpose search engines such as Google. Overall, our work provides the first large-scale, literature-derived infrastructure for urban data discovery and enables more systematic and reusable data-driven research across disciplines. Our code and data are publicly available\footnote{https://github.com/Yourunwen/Paper2Data}.

Yulin Li, Tengyao Tu, Li Ding et al.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet they often suffer from overthinking, expending redundant computational steps on simple problems, or underthinking, failing to explore sufficient reasoning paths despite inherent capabilities. These issues lead to inefficiencies and potential inaccuracies, limiting practical deployment in resource-constrained settings. Existing methods to mitigate overthinking, such as suppressing reflective keywords or adjusting reasoning length, may inadvertently induce underthinking, compromising accuracy. Therefore, we propose ReBalance, a training-free framework that achieves efficient reasoning with balanced thinking. ReBalance leverages confidence as a continuous indicator of reasoning dynamics, identifying overthinking through high confidence variance and underthinking via consistent overconfidence. By aggregating hidden states from a small-scale dataset into reasoning mode prototypes, we compute a steering vector to guide LRMs' reasoning trajectories. A dynamic control function modulates this vector's strength and direction based on real-time confidence, pruning redundancy during overthinking, and promoting exploration during underthinking. Extensive experiments conducted on four models ranging from 0.5B to 32B, and across nine benchmarks in math reasoning, general question answering, and coding tasks demonstrate that ReBalance effectively reduces output redundancy while improving accuracy, offering a general, training-free, and plug-and-play strategy for efficient and robust LRM deployment. Code is available at https://github.com/yu-lin-li/ReBalance .

Tengyao Tu, Wei Zeng, Kun Zhao et al.

Researching the specificity of TCR contributes to the development of immunotherapy and provides new opportunities and strategies for personalized cancer immunotherapy. Therefore, we established a TCR generative specificity detection framework consisting of an antigen selector and a TCR classifier based on the Random Forest algorithm, aiming to efficiently screen out TCRs and target antigens and achieve TCR specificity prediction. Furthermore, we used the k-fold validation method to compare the performance of our model with ordinary deep learning methods. The result proves that adding a classifier to the model based on the random forest algorithm is very effective, and our model generally outperforms ordinary deep learning methods. Moreover, we put forward feasible optimization suggestions for the shortcomings and challenges of our model found during model implementation.

Tong Xia, Jiankun Zhang, Ruiwen You et al.

Urban research aims to understand how cities operate and evolve as complex adaptive systems. With the rapid growth of urban data and analytical methodologies, the central challenge of the field has shifted from data availability to the integration of heterogeneous data into coherent, verifiable urban knowledge through multidisciplinary approaches. Recent advances in AI, particularly the emergence of large language models (LLMs), have enabled the development of AI scientists capable of autonomous reasoning, hypothesis generation, and data-driven experimentation, demonstrating substantial potential for autonomous urban research. However, most general-purpose AI systems remain misaligned with the domain-specific knowledge, methodological conventions, and inferential standards required in urban studies. Here, we introduce the AI Urban Scientist, a knowledge-driven multi-agent framework designed to support autonomous urban research. Grounded in hypotheses, peer-review feedback, datasets, and research methodologies distilled from large-scale prior studies, the system constructs structured domain knowledge that guides LLM-based agents to automatically generate hypotheses, identify and integrate multi-source urban datasets, conduct empirical analyses and simulations, and iteratively refine analytical methods. Through this process, the framework synthesizes new insights in urban science and accelerates the urban research lifecycle.