Zhiyao Yang

Jihong Ouyang, Zhiyao Yang, Silong Liang et al.

Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA), a fine-grained sentiment classification task, has received much attention recently. Many works investigate sentiment information through opinion words, such as ''good'' and ''bad''. However, implicit sentiment widely exists in the ABSA dataset, which refers to the sentence containing no distinct opinion words but still expresses sentiment to the aspect term. To deal with implicit sentiment, this paper proposes an ABSA method that integrates explicit sentiment augmentations. And we propose an ABSA-specific augmentation method to create such augmentations. Specifically, we post-trains T5 by rule-based data. We employ Syntax Distance Weighting and Unlikelihood Contrastive Regularization in the training procedure to guide the model to generate an explicit sentiment. Meanwhile, we utilize the Constrained Beam Search to ensure the augmentation sentence contains the aspect terms. We test ABSA-ESA on two of the most popular benchmarks of ABSA. The results show that ABSA-ESA outperforms the SOTA baselines on implicit and explicit sentiment accuracy.

Kaiyu Wang, Lin Mu, Zhiyao Yang et al.

Quality Assurance (QA) for radiology reports refers to judging whether the junior reports (written by junior doctors) are qualified. The QA scores of one junior report are given by the senior doctor(s) after reviewing the image and junior report. This process requires intensive labor costs for senior doctors. Additionally, the QA scores may be inaccurate for reasons like diagnosis bias, the ability of senior doctors, and so on. To address this issue, we propose a Span-level Quality Assurance EvaluaTOR (Sqator) to mark QA scores automatically. Unlike the common document-level semantic comparison method, we try to analyze the semantic difference by exploring more fine-grained text spans. Specifically, Sqator measures QA scores by measuring the importance of revised spans between junior and senior reports, and outputs the final QA scores by merging all revised span scores. We evaluate Sqator using a collection of 12,013 radiology reports. Experimental results show that Sqator can achieve competitive QA scores. Moreover, the importance scores of revised spans can be also consistent with the judgments of senior doctors.