August Y. Chen

August Y. Chen, Ayush Sekhari, Karthik Sridharan

We study the problem of non-convex optimization using Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD). SGLD is a natural and popular variation of stochastic gradient descent where at each step, appropriately scaled Gaussian noise is added. To our knowledge, the only strategy for showing global convergence of SGLD on the loss function is to show that SGLD can sample from a stationary distribution which assigns larger mass when the function is small (the Gibbs measure), and then to convert these guarantees to optimization results. We employ a new strategy to analyze the convergence of SGLD to global minima, based on Lyapunov potentials and optimization. We convert the same mild conditions from previous works on SGLD into geometric properties based on Lyapunov potentials. This adapts well to the case with a stochastic gradient oracle, which is natural for machine learning applications where one wants to minimize population loss but only has access to stochastic gradients via minibatch training samples. Here we provide 1) improved rates in the setting of previous works studying SGLD for optimization, 2) the first finite gradient complexity guarantee for SGLD where the function is Lipschitz and the Gibbs measure defined by the function satisfies a Poincaré Inequality, and 3) prove if continuous-time Langevin Dynamics succeeds for optimization, then discrete-time SGLD succeeds under mild regularity assumptions.

Daniel Yiming Cao, August Y. Chen, Karthik Sridharan et al.

We consider the robustness of score-based generative modeling to errors in the estimate of the score function. In particular, we show that Langevin dynamics is not robust to the L^2 errors (more generally L^p errors) in the estimate of the score function. It is well-established that with small L^2 errors in the estimate of the score function, diffusion models can sample faithfully from the target distribution under fairly mild regularity assumptions in a polynomial time horizon. In contrast, our work shows that even for simple distributions in high dimensions, Langevin dynamics run for any polynomial time horizon will produce a distribution far from the target distribution in Total Variation (TV) distance, even when the L^2 error (more generally L^p) of the estimate of the score function is arbitrarily small. Considering such an error in the estimate of the score function is unavoidable in practice when learning the score function from data, our results provide further justification for diffusion models over Langevin dynamics and serve to caution against the use of Langevin dynamics with estimated scores.

August Y. Chen, Ahmed El Alaoui

Let $S$ be the set of unit norm linear classifiers $θ\in \mathbb{R}^d$ which correctly classify every point of a labeled dataset $(X_i,y_i)_{i=1}^n$, $X_i \in \mathbb{R}^d$, $y_i \in \{-1,+1\}$, with a possibly negative margin $κ$ fixed in advance. Under two natural data-generating distributions of the $(X,y)$ pairs -- a Gaussian mixture model and a logistic model with Gaussian features -- and in the proportional regime $n/d \to α$ with small enough $α$, we establish a large deviation principle on the event that a point $θ$ chosen uniformly at random from $S$ achieves a given generalization error, with high probability over the choice of the data. The associated large deviation rate function is deterministic and describes the proportion, at the exponential scale in $d$, of interpolating classifiers having a given desired performance. As a consequence, we establish the following concentration phenomenon: all but an exponentially small fraction of interpolating classifiers have approximately the same generalization performance given by the unique maximizer of this rate function. We numerically compare this maximizer to the performance of empirical risk minimization by gradient descent and to the performance of a natural linear program, both finding a point in $S$, and deduce that in the overparametrized regime of small $α$, these efficient procedures outperform the vast majority of interpolators, pointing to their nontrivial benign overfitting in this setting.

Daniel Yiming Cao, August Y. Chen, Karthik Sridharan et al.

We study the optimization of non-convex functions that are not necessarily smooth (gradient and/or Hessian are Lipschitz) using first order methods. Smoothness is a restrictive assumption in machine learning in both theory and practice, motivating significant recent work on finding first order stationary points of functions satisfying generalizations of smoothness with first order methods. We develop a novel framework that lets us systematically study the convergence of a large class of first-order optimization algorithms (which we call decrease procedures) under generalizations of smoothness. We instantiate our framework to analyze the convergence of first order optimization algorithms to first and \textit{second} order stationary points under generalizations of smoothness. As a consequence, we establish the first convergence guarantees for first order methods to second order stationary points under generalizations of smoothness. We demonstrate that several canonical examples fall under our framework, and highlight practical implications.