Malak Baslyman

Asma Yamani, Malak Baslyman, Moataz Ahmed

AI systems are gaining widespread adoption across various sectors and domains. Creating high-quality AI system requirements is crucial for aligning the AI system with business goals and consumer values and for social responsibility. However, with the uncertain nature of AI systems and the heavy reliance on sensitive data, more research is needed to address the elicitation and analysis of AI systems requirements. With the proprietary nature of many AI systems, there is a lack of open-source requirements artifacts and technical requirements documents for AI systems, limiting broader research and investigation. With Large Language Models (LLMs) emerging as a promising alternative to human-generated text, this paper investigates the potential use of LLMs to generate user stories for AI systems based on abstracts from scholarly papers. We conducted an empirical evaluation using three LLMs and generated $1260$ user stories from $42$ abstracts from $26$ domains. We assess their quality using the Quality User Story (QUS) framework. Moreover, we identify relevant non-functional requirements (NFRs) and ethical principles. Our analysis demonstrates that the investigated LLMs can generate user stories inspired by the needs of various stakeholders, offering a promising approach for generating user stories for research purposes and for aiding in the early requirements elicitation phase of AI systems. We have compiled and curated a collection of stories generated by various LLMs into a dataset (UStAI), which is now publicly available for use.

Asma Yamani, Malak Baslyman, Moataz Ahmed

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly employed in software engineering tasks such as requirements elicitation, design, and evaluation, raising critical questions regarding their alignment with human judgments on responsible AI values. This study investigates how closely LLMs' value preferences align with those of two human groups: a US-representative sample and AI practitioners. We evaluate 23 LLMs across four tasks: (T1) selecting key responsible AI values, (T2) rating their importance in specific contexts, (T3) resolving trade-offs between competing values, and (T4) prioritizing software requirements that embody those values. The results show that LLMs generally align more closely with AI practitioners than with the US-representative sample, emphasizing fairness, privacy, transparency, safety, and accountability. However, inconsistencies appear between the values that LLMs claim to uphold (Tasks 1-3) and the way they prioritize requirements (Task 4), revealing gaps in faithfulness between stated and applied behavior. These findings highlight the practical risk of relying on LLMs in requirements engineering without human oversight and motivate the need for systematic approaches to benchmark, interpret, and monitor value alignment in AI-assisted software development.

Asma Yamani, Malak Baslyman

Text-to-Image generative systems are progressing rapidly to be a source of advertisement and media and could soon serve as image searches or artists. However, there is a significant concern about the representativity bias these models embody and how these biases can propagate in the social fabric after fine-tuning them. Therefore, continuously monitoring and evaluating these models for fairness is important. To address this issue, we propose Text-to-Image (TTI) Representativity Fairness Evaluation Framework. In this framework, we evaluate three aspects of a TTI system; diversity, inclusion, and quality. For each aspect, human-based and model-based approaches are proposed and evaluated for their ability to capture the bias and whether they can substitute each other. The framework starts by suggesting the prompts for generating the images for the evaluation based on the context and the sensitive attributes under study. Then the three aspects are evaluated using the proposed approaches. Based on the evaluation, a decision is made regarding the representativity bias within the TTI system. The evaluation of our framework on Stable Diffusion shows that the framework can effectively capture the bias in TTI systems. The results also confirm that our proposed model based-approaches can substitute human-based approaches in three out of four components with high correlation, which could potentially reduce costs and automate the process. The study suggests that continual learning of the model on more inclusive data across disadvantaged minorities such as Indians and Middle Easterners is essential to mitigate current stereotyping and lack of inclusiveness.