Mahdi Bagheri

Nitish Nagesh, Mahdi Bagheri, Arshia Harish Puthran et al.

Synthetic data is widely used in healthcare to create datasets that are similar to original data but without the privacy concerns. Generating and evaluating synthetic data across privacy, utility and fairness is crucial for facilitating high quality data availability for downstream prediction tasks and clinical decision making. We present Memisis, a tool that orchestrates and evaluates synthetic data by leveraging existing synthetic data tools, the power of large language models and state-of-the-art evaluation metrics. Our tool creates a unified workflow for data generation, validation and evaluation. Users have control over the training size, training epochs and the number of synthetic rows to sample. Instead of knobs to tune synthetic data, the interactive agent allows users to specify their synthetic data generation goals and the tool will orchestrate the workflow by leveraging existing tools while performing the requisite evaluation. For the demo, we use an open source schizophrenia dataset with protected attributes related to race and gender, three different synthesizers and a local language model to orchestrate the workflow. We observe that CTGAN, TVAE and GaussianCopula have comparable performance across fairness and utility metrics. The workflow allows users flexibility and control over the data generation and evaluation process.

Nitish Nagesh, Elahe Khatibi, Thomas Hughes et al.

Causal discovery in health data faces evaluation challenges when ground truth is unknown. We address this by collaborating with experts to construct proxy ground-truth graphs, establishing benchmarks for synthetic Alzheimer's disease and heart failure clinical records data. We evaluate the Peter-Clark, Greedy Equivalence Search, and Fast Causal Inference algorithms on structural recovery and path-specific fairness decomposition, going beyond composite fairness scores. On synthetic data, Peter-Clark achieved the best structural recovery. On heart failure data, Fast Causal Inference achieved the highest utility. For path-specific effects, ejection fraction contributed 3.37 percentage points to the indirect effect in the ground truth. These differences drove variations in the fairness-utility ratio across algorithms. Our results highlight the need for graph-aware fairness evaluation and fine-grained path-specific analysis when deploying causal discovery in clinical applications.

Mahdi Bagheri, Farhad Piri, Hadi Digale et al.

Augmented Reality (AR) has emerged as a significant advancement in surgical procedures, offering a solution to the challenges posed by traditional neuronavigation methods. These conventional techniques often necessitate surgeons to split their focus between the surgical site and a separate monitor that displays guiding images. Over the years, many systems have been developed to register and track the hologram at the targeted locations, each employed its own evaluation technique. On the other hand, hologram displacement measurement is not a straightforward task because of various factors such as occlusion, Vengence-Accomodation Conflict, and unstable holograms in space. In this study, we explore and classify different techniques for assessing an AR-assisted neurosurgery system and propose a new technique to systematize the assessment procedure. Moreover, we conduct a deeper investigation to assess surgeon error in the pre- and intra-operative phases of the surgery based on the respective feedback given. We found that although the system can undergo registration and tracking errors, physical feedback can significantly reduce the error caused by hologram displacement. However, the lack of visual feedback on the hologram does not have a significant effect on the user 3D perception.

Nitish Nagesh, Salar Shakibhamedan, Mahdi Bagheri et al.

Generating synthetic data is crucial in privacy-sensitive, data-scarce settings, especially for tabular datasets widely used in real-world applications. A key challenge is improving counterfactual and causal fairness, while preserving high utility. We present FairTabGen, a fairness-aware large language model-based framework for tabular synthetic data generation. We integrate multiple fairness definitions including counterfactual and causal fairness into both its generation and evaluation pipelines. We use in-context learning, prompt refinement, and fairness-aware data curation to balance fairness and utility. Across diverse datasets, our method outperforms state-of-the-art GAN-based and LLM-based methods, achieving up to 10% improvements on fairness metrics such as demographic parity and path-specific causal effects while retaining statistical utility. Remarkably, it achieves these gains using less than 20% of the original data, highlighting its efficiency in low-data regimes. These results demonstrate a principled and practical approach for generating fair and useful synthetic tabular data.