Shaoyang Li

Zong Chen, Xuebin Li, Jinpeng Xiao et al.

We study the problem of scaling dynamic loco-manipulation from a single free-rolling sphere to multiple spheres transported simultaneously on the back of a wheel-legged quadruped, without fences, grippers, or mechanical stops. Multiple identical free-rolling spheres form an unordered set with no persistent identity: their ordering may change independently at each history frame, creating a \emph{per-frame permutation symmetry} that standard history-concatenation set encoders do not explicitly enforce -- these encoders impose only a shared, diagonal permutation symmetry over the full history. We show that this symmetry mismatch leads to a concrete failure mode in curriculum-based reinforcement learning. Within the same PPO training budget, flat MLPs and branch-wise encoders plateau at or below the two-sphere stage, while a history-concatenation Deep Sets baseline (\HCDS) fails to progress past the two-sphere stage in our runs unless ball-to-slot assignments are randomised during training, suggesting that it exploits slot indices as a curriculum shortcut rather than learning identity-free multi-sphere dynamics. We propose \textbf{Per-Frame Deep Sets (\PFDS)}, which performs permutation-invariant pooling within each history frame before temporal readout; we prove that \PFDS is $\Gframe$-invariant and universally approximates continuous $\Gframe$-invariant policies. A $2{\times}2$ ablation over encoder architecture and slot randomisation separates the architectural and data-augmentation pathways, and \PFDS reaches the five-sphere stage with 100\% no-drop transport in simulation across all five random seeds. We further distill the \PFDS teacher into \TactSet via DAgger, replacing privileged sphere-state observations with a $16{\times}16$ Boolean union contact map, yielding a compact and naturally $\Gframe$-invariant tactile representation.

Qing He, Dongsheng Bi, Jianrong Lu et al.

The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) presents transformative potential for healthcare, yet practical deployment is hindered by the absence of frameworks that assess real-world clinical utility. Existing benchmarks test static knowledge, failing to capture the dynamic, application-oriented capabilities required in clinical practice. To bridge this gap, we introduce a Medical LLM Benchmark MLB, a comprehensive benchmark evaluating LLMs on both foundational knowledge and scenario-based reasoning. MLB is structured around five core dimensions: Medical Knowledge (MedKQA), Safety and Ethics (MedSE), Medical Record Understanding (MedRU), Smart Services (SmartServ), and Smart Healthcare (SmartCare). The benchmark integrates 22 datasets (17 newly curated) from diverse Chinese clinical sources, covering 64 clinical specialties. Its design features a rigorous curation pipeline involving 300 licensed physicians. Besides, we provide a scalable evaluation methodology, centered on a specialized judge model trained via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on expert annotations. Our comprehensive evaluation of 10 leading models reveals a critical translational gap: while the top-ranked model, Kimi-K2-Instruct (77.3% accuracy overall), excels in structured tasks like information extraction (87.8% accuracy in MedRU), performance plummets in patient-facing scenarios (61.3% in SmartServ). Moreover, the exceptional safety score (90.6% in MedSE) of the much smaller Baichuan-M2-32B highlights that targeted training is equally critical. Our specialized judge model, trained via SFT on a 19k expert-annotated medical dataset, achieves 92.1% accuracy, an F1-score of 94.37%, and a Cohen's Kappa of 81.3% for human-AI consistency, validating a reproducible and expert-aligned evaluation protocol. MLB thus provides a rigorous framework to guide the development of clinically viable LLMs.