Jua Han

Jua Han, Jaeyoon Seo, Jungbin Min et al.

One mistake by an AI system in a safety-critical setting can cost lives. As Large Language Models (LLMs) become integral to robotics decision-making, the physical dimension of risk grows; a single wrong instruction can directly endanger human safety. This paper addresses the urgent need to systematically evaluate LLM performance in scenarios where even minor errors are catastrophic. Through a qualitative evaluation of a fire evacuation scenario, we identified critical failure cases in LLM-based decision-making. Based on these, we designed seven tasks for quantitative assessment, categorized into: Complete Information, Incomplete Information, and Safety-Oriented Spatial Reasoning (SOSR). Complete information tasks utilize ASCII maps to minimize interpretation ambiguity and isolate spatial reasoning from visual processing. Incomplete information tasks require models to infer missing context, testing for spatial continuity versus hallucinations. SOSR tasks use natural language to evaluate safe decision-making in life-threatening contexts. We benchmark various LLMs and Vision-Language Models (VLMs) across these tasks. Beyond aggregate performance, we analyze the implications of a 1% failure rate, highlighting how "rare" errors escalate into catastrophic outcomes. Results reveal serious vulnerabilities: several models achieved a 0% success rate in ASCII navigation, while in a simulated fire drill, models instructed robots to move toward hazardous areas instead of emergency exits. Our findings lead to a sobering conclusion: current LLMs are not ready for direct deployment in safety-critical systems. A 99% accuracy rate is dangerously misleading in robotics, as it implies one out of every hundred executions could result in catastrophic harm. We demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models cannot guarantee safety, and absolute reliance on them creates unacceptable risks.

Minsik Lee, Seoi Hong, Chongmin Lee et al.

Despite recent progress in automatic speech recognition (ASR), elderly ASR (EASR) remains challenging due to limited training data and the distinct acoustic and linguistic characteristics of elderly speech. In this work, we address data scarcity in EASR through a data augmentation pipeline that combines large language model (LLM)-based transcript paraphrasing with text-to-speech (TTS) synthesis. Given an elderly speech dataset, the LLM first generates elderly-contextual paraphrases of the original transcripts, and the TTS model then synthesizes corresponding speech using elderly reference speakers. The resulting synthetic audio-text pairs are merged with the original data to fine-tune Whisper without architectural modification. We further analyze the effects of augmentation ratio and reference-speaker composition in low-resource EASR. Experiments on English and Korean elderly speech datasets from speakers aged 70 and above show that the proposed method consistently improves performance over conventional augmentation baselines, achieving up to a 58.2% reduction in word error rate (WER) compared with the Whisper baseline.