94.3CEMay 26Code
From Centerlines to Hemodynamics: Anisotropic RBF Decoders for Coronary ArteriesReza Akbarian Bafghi, Sukirt Thakur, Maziar Raissi
Accurate and rapid estimation of hemodynamic metrics, such as pressure and wall shear stress (WSS), is important for assessing the severity of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). Existing approaches, including invasive Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) measurements and computationally expensive Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations, face challenges in invasiveness, cost, and speed. We present a framework for fast, non-invasive coronary hemodynamics prediction. The model encodes 1D vessel centerlines together with inlet flow rate using a transformer-based encoder, and predicts continuous wall-based fields via an anisotropic Radial Basis Function (RBF) decoder aligned with vessel morphology. To support training and evaluation, we introduce two datasets with paired steady-state OpenFOAM simulations: (i) a synthetic benchmark of 4,200 single-vessel geometries with controlled anatomical variations, and (ii) a multi-vessel dataset derived from ImageCAS including 4,800 cases spanning both right and left coronary arteries, generated by randomly introducing stenoses and varying physiologically plausible flow rates. Across both datasets, our method achieves lower pressure and WSS errors than strong neural-operator baselines (GNOT, Transolver, and ONO) at a fraction of the computational cost of CFD. On the multi-vessel dataset, using 1,024 anisotropic RBF centers our model reduces the mean relative L2 error by 52% compared to the best neural-operator baseline, while at 128 centers it requires 13.8x fewer FLOPs than GNOT and still outperforms all baselines. The single-vessel dataset is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/angioinsight/single-vessel-flow.
LGJan 23
PUNCH: Physics-informed Uncertainty-aware Network for Coronary HemodynamicsSukirt Thakur, Marcus Roper, Yang Zhou et al.
More than 10 million coronary angiograms are performed globally each year, providing a gold standard for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Yet, no obstructive lesions are identified in 70% of patients evaluated for ischemic heart disease. Up to half of these patients have undiagnosed, life-limiting coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), which remains under-detected due to the limited availability of invasive tools required to measure coronary flow reserve (CFR). Here, we introduce PUNCH, a non-invasive, uncertainty-aware framework for estimating CFR directly from standard coronary angiography. PUNCH integrates physics-informed neural networks with variational inference to infer coronary blood flow from first-principles models of contrast transport, without requiring ground-truth flow measurements or population-level training. The pipeline runs in approximately three minutes per patient on a single GPU. Validated on synthetic angiograms with controlled noise and imaging artifacts, as well as on clinical bolus thermodilution data from 20 patients, PUNCH demonstrates accurate and uncertainty-calibrated CFR estimation. This approach establishes a new paradigm for CMD diagnosis and illustrates how physics-informed inference can substantially expand the diagnostic utility of available clinical imaging.
FLU-DYNJan 30, 2023
Temporal Consistency Loss for Physics-Informed Neural NetworksSukirt Thakur, Maziar Raissi, Harsa Mitra et al.
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have been widely used to solve partial differential equations in a forward and inverse manner using deep neural networks. However, training these networks can be challenging for multiscale problems. While statistical methods can be employed to scale the regression loss on data, it is generally challenging to scale the loss terms for equations. This paper proposes a method for scaling the mean squared loss terms in the objective function used to train PINNs. Instead of using automatic differentiation to calculate the temporal derivative, we use backward Euler discretization. This provides us with a scaling term for the equations. In this work, we consider the two and three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations and determine the kinematic viscosity using the spatio-temporal data on the velocity and pressure fields. We first consider numerical datasets to test our method. We test the sensitivity of our method to the time step size, the number of timesteps, noise in the data, and spatial resolution. Finally, we use the velocity field obtained using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) experiments to generate a reference pressure field. We then test our framework using the velocity and reference pressure field.
NEJun 6, 2024
Physics-Informed Neural Network based inverse framework for time-fractional differential equations for rheologySukirt Thakur, Harsa Mitra, Arezoo M. Ardekani
Time-fractional differential equations offer a robust framework for capturing intricate phenomena characterized by memory effects, particularly in fields like biotransport and rheology. However, solving inverse problems involving fractional derivatives presents notable challenges, including issues related to stability and uniqueness. While Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as effective tools for solving inverse problems, most existing PINN frameworks primarily focus on integer-ordered derivatives. In this study, we extend the application of PINNs to address inverse problems involving time-fractional derivatives, specifically targeting two problems: 1) anomalous diffusion and 2) fractional viscoelastic constitutive equation. Leveraging both numerically generated datasets and experimental data, we calibrate the concentration-dependent generalized diffusion coefficient and parameters for the fractional Maxwell model. We devise a tailored residual loss function that scales with the standard deviation of observed data. We rigorously test our framework's efficacy in handling anomalous diffusion. Even after introducing 25% Gaussian noise to the concentration dataset, our framework demonstrates remarkable robustness. Notably, the relative error in predicting the generalized diffusion coefficient and the order of the fractional derivative is less than 10% for all cases, underscoring the resilience and accuracy of our approach. In another test case, we predict relaxation moduli for three pig tissue samples, consistently achieving relative errors below 10%. Furthermore, our framework exhibits promise in modeling anomalous diffusion and non-linear fractional viscoelasticity.