Graph Positional and Structural EncoderSemih Cantürk, Renming Liu, Olivier Lapointe-Gagné et al. · mila
Positional and structural encodings (PSE) enable better identifiability of nodes within a graph, rendering them essential tools for empowering modern GNNs, and in particular graph Transformers. However, designing PSEs that work optimally for all graph prediction tasks is a challenging and unsolved problem. Here, we present the Graph Positional and Structural Encoder (GPSE), the first-ever graph encoder designed to capture rich PSE representations for augmenting any GNN. GPSE learns an efficient common latent representation for multiple PSEs, and is highly transferable: The encoder trained on a particular graph dataset can be used effectively on datasets drawn from markedly different distributions and modalities. We show that across a wide range of benchmarks, GPSE-enhanced models can significantly outperform those that employ explicitly computed PSEs, and at least match their performance in others. Our results pave the way for the development of foundational pre-trained graph encoders for extracting positional and structural information, and highlight their potential as a more powerful and efficient alternative to explicitly computed PSEs and existing self-supervised pre-training approaches. Our framework and pre-trained models are publicly available at https://github.com/G-Taxonomy-Workgroup/GPSE. For convenience, GPSE has also been integrated into the PyG library to facilitate downstream applications.
Taxonomy of Benchmarks in Graph Representation LearningRenming Liu, Semih Cantürk, Frederik Wenkel et al. · mila
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) extend the success of neural networks to graph-structured data by accounting for their intrinsic geometry. While extensive research has been done on developing GNN models with superior performance according to a collection of graph representation learning benchmarks, it is currently not well understood what aspects of a given model are probed by them. For example, to what extent do they test the ability of a model to leverage graph structure vs. node features? Here, we develop a principled approach to taxonomize benchmarking datasets according to a $\textit{sensitivity profile}$ that is based on how much GNN performance changes due to a collection of graph perturbations. Our data-driven analysis provides a deeper understanding of which benchmarking data characteristics are leveraged by GNNs. Consequently, our taxonomy can aid in selection and development of adequate graph benchmarks, and better informed evaluation of future GNN methods. Finally, our approach and implementation in $\texttt{GTaxoGym}$ package are extendable to multiple graph prediction task types and future datasets.
1.6LGOct 27, 2021
Towards a Taxonomy of Graph Learning DatasetsRenming Liu, Semih Cantürk, Frederik Wenkel et al.
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have attracted much attention due to their ability to leverage the intrinsic geometries of the underlying data. Although many different types of GNN models have been developed, with many benchmarking procedures to demonstrate the superiority of one GNN model over the others, there is a lack of systematic understanding of the underlying benchmarking datasets, and what aspects of the model are being tested. Here, we provide a principled approach to taxonomize graph benchmarking datasets by carefully designing a collection of graph perturbations to probe the essential data characteristics that GNN models leverage to perform predictions. Our data-driven taxonomization of graph datasets provides a new understanding of critical dataset characteristics that will enable better model evaluation and the development of more specialized GNN models.