Xiatao Sun

Yiyou Sun, Xinyang Han, Weichen Zhang et al.

Recent AI systems have achieved strong results on a wide range of benchmarks, yet these gains have not translated into economically meaningful deployment across many professional domains. We argue that this gap is largely an evaluation problem: widely used benchmarks lack sustained performance measurement on real and economically valuable workflows. This paper introduces Agents' Last Exam (ALE), a benchmark designed to evaluate AI agents on long-horizon, economically valuable, real-world tasks with verifiable outcomes. Developed in collaboration with 250+ industry experts, ALE covers non-physical industries defined with reference to O*NET / SOC 2018 (the U.S. federal occupational taxonomy). It is organized around a task taxonomy with 55 subfields grouped into 13 industry clusters covering 1K+ tasks. Current results show that the hardest tier remains far from saturated: across mainstream harness and backbone configurations, the average full pass rate is 2.6%. ALE is designed as a living benchmark: its task pool grows continuously as new workflows and industries are onboarded. More broadly, ALE is intended not merely as another leaderboard, but as an instrument for closing the gap between benchmark success and GDP-relevant impact.

Xiatao Sun, Shuo Yang, Mingyan Zhou et al.

Imitation learning has been widely applied to various autonomous systems thanks to recent development in interactive algorithms that address covariate shift and compounding errors induced by traditional approaches like behavior cloning. However, existing interactive imitation learning methods assume access to one perfect expert. Whereas in reality, it is more likely to have multiple imperfect experts instead. In this paper, we propose MEGA-DAgger, a new DAgger variant that is suitable for interactive learning with multiple imperfect experts. First, unsafe demonstrations are filtered while aggregating the training data, so the imperfect demonstrations have little influence when training the novice policy. Next, experts are evaluated and compared on scenarios-specific metrics to resolve the conflicted labels among experts. Through experiments in autonomous racing scenarios, we demonstrate that policy learned using MEGA-DAgger can outperform both experts and policies learned using the state-of-the-art interactive imitation learning algorithms such as Human-Gated DAgger. The supplementary video can be found at \url{https://youtu.be/wPCht31MHrw}.

Chen Liang, Xiatao Sun, Qian Wang et al.

Zeroth-Order (ZO) optimization is pivotal for scenarios where backpropagation is unavailable, such as memory-constrained on-device learning and black-box optimization. However, existing methods face a stark trade-off: they are either sample-inefficient (e.g., standard finite differences) or suffer from high variance due to randomized estimation (e.g., random subspace methods). In this work, we propose Coherent Coordinate Descent (CoCD), a deterministic, sample-efficient, and budget-aware ZO optimizer. Theoretically, we formalize the notion of gradient coherence and demonstrate that CoCD is equivalent to Block Cyclic Coordinate Descent (BCCD) with ``warm starts,'' effectively converting historical (stale) gradients from a liability into a computational asset. This mechanism enables $O(1)$ query complexity per step while maintaining global descent directions. Furthermore, we derive error bounds revealing a counter-intuitive insight: larger finite-difference step sizes can induce an implicit smoothing effect on the optimization landscape by reducing the effective smoothness constant, thereby improving convergence stability. Experiments on MLP, CNN, and ResNet architectures (up to 270k parameters) demonstrate that CoCD significantly outperforms BCCD in terms of sample efficiency and convergence loss/accuracy, and exhibits superior stability over randomized ZO methods. Our results suggest that deterministic, structure-aware updates offer a superior alternative to randomization for lightweight ZO optimization.

Ziyao Zeng, Chen Liu, Tianyu Liu et al.

Game balancing is a longstanding challenge requiring repeated playtesting, expert intuition, and extensive manual tuning. We introduce RuleSmith, the first framework that achieves automated game balancing by leveraging the reasoning capabilities of multi-agent LLMs. It couples a game engine, multi-agent LLMs self-play, and Bayesian optimization operating over a multi-dimensional rule space. As a proof of concept, we instantiate RuleSmith on CivMini, a simplified civilization-style game containing heterogeneous factions, economy systems, production rules, and combat mechanics, all governed by tunable parameters. LLM agents interpret textual rulebooks and game states to generate actions, to conduct fast evaluation of balance metrics such as win-rate disparities. To search the parameter landscape efficiently, we integrate Bayesian optimization with acquisition-based adaptive sampling and discrete projection: promising candidates receive more evaluation games for accurate assessment, while exploratory candidates receive fewer games for efficient exploration. Experiments show that RuleSmith converges to highly balanced configurations and provides interpretable rule adjustments that can be directly applied to downstream game systems. Our results illustrate that LLM simulation can serve as a powerful surrogate for automating design and balancing in complex multi-agent environments.