Andrea Valsecchi

Óscar Ibáñez, Enrique Bermejo, Andrea Valsecchi

Craniofacial Superimposition involves the superimposition of an image of a skull with a number of ante-mortem face images of an individual and the analysis of their morphological correspondence. Despite being used for one century, it is not yet a mature and fully accepted technique due to the absence of solid scientific approaches, significant reliability studies, and international standards. In this paper we present a comprehensive experimentation on the limitations of Craniofacial Superimposition as a forensic identification technique. The study involves different experiments over more than 1 Million comparisons performed by a landmark-based automatic 3D/2D superimposition method. The total sample analyzed consists of 320 subjects and 29 craniofacial landmarks.

Práxedes Martínez-Moreno, Andrea Valsecchi, Pablo Mesejo et al.

Craniofacial Superimposition is a forensic technique for identifying skeletal remains by comparing a post-mortem skull with ante-mortem facial photographs. A critical step in this process is Skull-Face Overlay (SFO). This stage involves aligning a 3D skull model with a 2D facial image, typically guided by cranial and facial landmarks' correspondence. However, its accuracy is undermined by individual variability in soft-tissue thickness, introducing significant uncertainty into the overlay. This paper introduces Lilium, an automated evolutionary method to enhance the accuracy and robustness of SFO. Lilium explicitly models soft-tissue variability using a 3D cone-based representation whose parameters are optimized via a Differential Evolution algorithm. The method enforces anatomical, morphological, and photographic plausibility through a combination of constraints: landmark matching, camera parameter consistency, head pose alignment, skull containment within facial boundaries, and region parallelism. This emulation of the usual forensic practitioners' approach leads Lilium to outperform the state-of-the-art method in terms of both accuracy and robustness.

Antonio D. Villegas-Yeguas, Xavier Abreau-Freire, Guillermo R-García et al.

Dental comparison is considered a primary identification method, at the level of fingerprints and DNA profiling. One crucial but time-consuming step of this method is the morphological comparison. One of the main challenges to apply this method is the lack of ante-mortem medical records, specially on scenarios such as migrant death at the border and/or in countries where there is no universal healthcare. The availability of photos on social media where teeth are visible has led many odontologists to consider morphological comparison using them. However, state-of-the-art proposals have significant limitations, including the lack of proper modeling of perspective distortion and the absence of objective approaches that quantify morphological differences. Our proposal involves a 3D (post-mortem scan) - 2D (ante-mortem photos) approach. Using computer vision and optimization techniques, we replicate the ante-mortem image with the 3D model to perform the morphological comparison. Two automatic approaches have been developed: i) using paired landmarks and ii) using a segmentation of the teeth region to estimate camera parameters. Both are capable of obtaining very promising results over 20,164 cross comparisons from 142 samples, obtaining mean ranking values of 1.6 and 1.5, respectively. These results clearly outperform filtering capabilities of automatic dental chart comparison approaches, while providing an automatic, objective and quantitative score of the morphological correspondence, easily to interpret and analyze by visualizing superimposed images.

Lucas Faria Porto, Laise Nascimento Correia Lima, Marta Flores et al.

Facial landmarks are employed in many research areas such as facial recognition, craniofacial identification, age and sex estimation among the most important. In the forensic field, the focus is on the analysis of a particular set of facial landmarks, defined as cephalometric landmarks. Previous works demonstrated that the descriptive adequacy of these anatomical references for an indirect application (photo-anthropometric description) increased the marking precision of these points, contributing to a greater reliability of these analyzes. However, most of them are performed manually and all of them are subjectivity inherent to the expert examiners. In this sense, the purpose of this work is the development and validation of automatic techniques to detect cephalometric landmarks from digital images of frontal faces in forensic field. The presented approach uses a combination of computer vision and image processing techniques within a supervised learning procedures. The proposed methodology obtains similar precision to a group of human manual cephalometric reference markers and result to be more accurate against others state-of-the-art facial landmark detection frameworks. It achieves a normalized mean distance (in pixel) error of 0.014, similar to the mean inter-expert dispersion (0.009) and clearly better than other automatic approaches also analyzed along of this work (0.026 and 0.101).