1.8LGJun 29, 2022
Extreme compression of sentence-transformer ranker models: faster inference, longer battery life, and less storage on edge devicesAmit Chaulwar, Lukas Malik, Maciej Krajewski et al.
Modern search systems use several large ranker models with transformer architectures. These models require large computational resources and are not suitable for usage on devices with limited computational resources. Knowledge distillation is a popular compression technique that can reduce the resource needs of such models, where a large teacher model transfers knowledge to a small student model. To drastically reduce memory requirements and energy consumption, we propose two extensions for a popular sentence-transformer distillation procedure: generation of an optimal size vocabulary and dimensionality reduction of the embedding dimension of teachers prior to distillation. We evaluate these extensions on two different types of ranker models. This results in extremely compressed student models whose analysis on a test dataset shows the significance and utility of our proposed extensions.
2.1AIAug 29, 2023
Natural language to SQL in low-code platformsSofia Aparicio, Samuel Arcadinho, João Nadkarni et al.
One of the developers' biggest challenges in low-code platforms is retrieving data from a database using SQL queries. Here, we propose a pipeline allowing developers to write natural language (NL) to retrieve data. In this study, we collect, label, and validate data covering the SQL queries most often performed by OutSystems users. We use that data to train a NL model that generates SQL. Alongside this, we describe the entire pipeline, which comprises a feedback loop that allows us to quickly collect production data and use it to retrain our SQL generation model. Using crowd-sourcing, we collect 26k NL and SQL pairs and obtain an additional 1k pairs from production data. Finally, we develop a UI that allows developers to input a NL query in a prompt and receive a user-friendly representation of the resulting SQL query. We use A/B testing to compare four different models in production and observe a 240% improvement in terms of adoption of the feature, 220% in terms of engagement rate, and a 90% decrease in failure rate when compared against the first model that we put into production, showcasing the effectiveness of our pipeline in continuously improving our feature.