LGJun 26, 2022
Bounding the Width of Neural Networks via Coupled Initialization -- A Worst Case AnalysisAlexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor, Zhao Song et al.
A common method in training neural networks is to initialize all the weights to be independent Gaussian vectors. We observe that by instead initializing the weights into independent pairs, where each pair consists of two identical Gaussian vectors, we can significantly improve the convergence analysis. While a similar technique has been studied for random inputs [Daniely, NeurIPS 2020], it has not been analyzed with arbitrary inputs. Using this technique, we show how to significantly reduce the number of neurons required for two-layer ReLU networks, both in the under-parameterized setting with logistic loss, from roughly $γ^{-8}$ [Ji and Telgarsky, ICLR 2020] to $γ^{-2}$, where $γ$ denotes the separation margin with a Neural Tangent Kernel, as well as in the over-parameterized setting with squared loss, from roughly $n^4$ [Song and Yang, 2019] to $n^2$, implicitly also improving the recent running time bound of [Brand, Peng, Song and Weinstein, ITCS 2021]. For the under-parameterized setting we also prove new lower bounds that improve upon prior work, and that under certain assumptions, are best possible.
DSMar 31, 2023
Almost Linear Constant-Factor Sketching for $\ell_1$ and Logistic RegressionAlexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor, David Woodruff
We improve upon previous oblivious sketching and turnstile streaming results for $\ell_1$ and logistic regression, giving a much smaller sketching dimension achieving $O(1)$-approximation and yielding an efficient optimization problem in the sketch space. Namely, we achieve for any constant $c>0$ a sketching dimension of $\tilde{O}(d^{1+c})$ for $\ell_1$ regression and $\tilde{O}(μd^{1+c})$ for logistic regression, where $μ$ is a standard measure that captures the complexity of compressing the data. For $\ell_1$-regression our sketching dimension is near-linear and improves previous work which either required $Ω(\log d)$-approximation with this sketching dimension, or required a larger $\operatorname{poly}(d)$ number of rows. Similarly, for logistic regression previous work had worse $\operatorname{poly}(μd)$ factors in its sketching dimension. We also give a tradeoff that yields a $1+\varepsilon$ approximation in input sparsity time by increasing the total size to $(d\log(n)/\varepsilon)^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ for $\ell_1$ and to $(μd\log(n)/\varepsilon)^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ for logistic regression. Finally, we show that our sketch can be extended to approximate a regularized version of logistic regression where the data-dependent regularizer corresponds to the variance of the individual logistic losses.
DSMar 25, 2022
$p$-Generalized Probit Regression and Scalable Maximum Likelihood Estimation via Sketching and CoresetsAlexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor, Christian Peters
We study the $p$-generalized probit regression model, which is a generalized linear model for binary responses. It extends the standard probit model by replacing its link function, the standard normal cdf, by a $p$-generalized normal distribution for $p\in[1, \infty)$. The $p$-generalized normal distributions \citep{Sub23} are of special interest in statistical modeling because they fit much more flexibly to data. Their tail behavior can be controlled by choice of the parameter $p$, which influences the model's sensitivity to outliers. Special cases include the Laplace, the Gaussian, and the uniform distributions. We further show how the maximum likelihood estimator for $p$-generalized probit regression can be approximated efficiently up to a factor of $(1+\varepsilon)$ on large data by combining sketching techniques with importance subsampling to obtain a small data summary called coreset.
59.2LGMay 22
Optimal Dimension-Free Sampling for Regularized ClassificationMeysam Alishahi, Alexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor et al.
We prove optimal sampling bounds achieving $(1\pm\varepsilon)$-relative error for a broad class of Lipschitz continuous classification loss functions under various regularization terms. This includes important functions such as logistic and sigmoid loss, hinge loss, and ReLU loss, as prominent and popular representative examples. In particular, we prove $k^2/\varepsilon^2$ upper and lower bounds for $\|\cdot\|_2/k$ regularization, and $k/\varepsilon^2$ upper and lower bounds for $\|\cdot\|_1/k$ regularization. For $\|\cdot\|_2^2/k$ regularization, the sampling complexity depends mainly on a bounded derivative property: if $|g'(x)|\leq g(x)$, and $g(0)>0$, and $g$ is monotonic or convex, then it admits linear in $k$ sampling complexity; otherwise the general bound is $k^2/\varepsilon^2$. However, if $g(0)=0$, our results indicate that no dimension-free bounds are possible, and even sublinear bounds are ruled out. All upper bounds are complemented by matching lower bounds up to polylogarithmic terms. Moreover, our work relies conceptually and algorithmically on simple uniform or (squared) norm sampling and hereby improves over recent cubic $k^3/\varepsilon^2$ sensitivity sampling bounds of (Alishahi and Phillips, ICML'24). This is achieved by refined arguments involving higher moment bounds and empirical process analyses to avoid overcounting that appears in the de-facto standard VC-dimension and sensitivity framework.
31.5LGMar 20
Scalable Learning of Multivariate Distributions via CoresetsZeyu Ding, Katja Ickstadt, Nadja Klein et al.
Efficient and scalable non-parametric or semi-parametric regression analysis and density estimation are of crucial importance to the fields of statistics and machine learning. However, available methods are limited in their ability to handle large-scale data. We address this issue by developing a novel coreset construction for multivariate conditional transformation models (MCTMs) to enhance their scalability and training efficiency. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first coresets for semi-parametric distributional models. Our approach yields substantial data reduction via importance sampling. It ensures with high probability that the log-likelihood remains within multiplicative error bounds of $(1\pm\varepsilon)$ and thereby maintains statistical model accuracy. Compared to conventional full-parametric models, where coresets have been incorporated before, our semi-parametric approach exhibits enhanced adaptability, particularly in scenarios where complex distributions and non-linear relationships are present, but not fully understood. To address numerical problems associated with normalizing logarithmic terms, we follow a geometric approximation based on the convex hull of input data. This ensures feasible, stable, and accurate inference in scenarios involving large amounts of data. Numerical experiments demonstrate substantially improved computational efficiency when handling large and complex datasets, thus laying the foundation for a broad range of applications within the statistics and machine learning communities.
65.7CGMar 19
Hardness of High-Dimensional Linear ClassificationAlexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor, Jeff M. Phillips
We establish new exponential in dimension lower bounds for the Maximum Halfspace Discrepancy problem, which models linear classification. Both are fundamental problems in computational geometry and machine learning in their exact and approximate forms. However, only $O(n^d)$ and respectively $\tilde O(1/\varepsilon^d)$ upper bounds are known and complemented by polynomial lower bounds that do not support the exponential in dimension dependence. We close this gap up to polylogarithmic terms by reduction from widely-believed hardness conjectures for Affine Degeneracy testing and $k$-Sum problems. Our reductions yield matching lower bounds of $\tildeΩ(n^d)$ and respectively $\tildeΩ(1/\varepsilon^d)$ based on Affine Degeneracy testing, and $\tildeΩ(n^{d/2})$ and respectively $\tildeΩ(1/\varepsilon^{d/2})$ conditioned on $k$-Sum. The first bound also holds unconditionally if the computational model is restricted to make sidedness queries, which corresponds to a widely spread setting implemented and optimized in many contemporary algorithms and computing paradigms.
DSJun 1, 2024
Turnstile $\ell_p$ leverage score sampling with applicationsAlexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor
The turnstile data stream model offers the most flexible framework where data can be manipulated dynamically, i.e., rows, columns, and even single entries of an input matrix can be added, deleted, or updated multiple times in a data stream. We develop a novel algorithm for sampling rows $a_i$ of a matrix $A\in\mathbb{R}^{n\times d}$, proportional to their $\ell_p$ norm, when $A$ is presented in a turnstile data stream. Our algorithm not only returns the set of sampled row indexes, it also returns slightly perturbed rows $\tilde{a}_i \approx a_i$, and approximates their sampling probabilities up to $\varepsilon$ relative error. When combined with preconditioning techniques, our algorithm extends to $\ell_p$ leverage score sampling over turnstile data streams. With these properties in place, it allows us to simulate subsampling constructions of coresets for important regression problems to operate over turnstile data streams with very little overhead compared to their respective off-line subsampling algorithms. For logistic regression, our framework yields the first algorithm that achieves a $(1+\varepsilon)$ approximation and works in a turnstile data stream using polynomial sketch/subsample size, improving over $O(1)$ approximations, or $\exp(1/\varepsilon)$ sketch size of previous work. We compare experimentally to plain oblivious sketching and plain leverage score sampling algorithms for $\ell_p$ and logistic regression.
DSJun 1, 2024
Optimal bounds for $\ell_p$ sensitivity sampling via $\ell_2$ augmentationAlexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor
Data subsampling is one of the most natural methods to approximate a massively large data set by a small representative proxy. In particular, sensitivity sampling received a lot of attention, which samples points proportional to an individual importance measure called sensitivity. This framework reduces in very general settings the size of data to roughly the VC dimension $d$ times the total sensitivity $\mathfrak S$ while providing strong $(1\pm\varepsilon)$ guarantees on the quality of approximation. The recent work of Woodruff & Yasuda (2023c) improved substantially over the general $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\mathfrak Sd)$ bound for the important problem of $\ell_p$ subspace embeddings to $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\mathfrak S^{2/p})$ for $p\in[1,2]$. Their result was subsumed by an earlier $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}\mathfrak Sd^{1-p/2})$ bound which was implicitly given in the work of Chen & Derezinski (2021). We show that their result is tight when sampling according to plain $\ell_p$ sensitivities. We observe that by augmenting the $\ell_p$ sensitivities by $\ell_2$ sensitivities, we obtain better bounds improving over the aforementioned results to optimal linear $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}(\mathfrak S+d)) = \tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}d)$ sampling complexity for all $p \in [1,2]$. In particular, this resolves an open question of Woodruff & Yasuda (2023c) in the affirmative for $p \in [1,2]$ and brings sensitivity subsampling into the regime that was previously only known to be possible using Lewis weights (Cohen & Peng, 2015). As an application of our main result, we also obtain an $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}μd)$ sensitivity sampling bound for logistic regression, where $μ$ is a natural complexity measure for this problem. This improves over the previous $\tilde O(\varepsilon^{-2}μ^2 d)$ bound of Mai et al. (2021) which was based on Lewis weights subsampling.
DSJul 14, 2021
Oblivious sketching for logistic regressionAlexander Munteanu, Simon Omlor, David Woodruff
What guarantees are possible for solving logistic regression in one pass over a data stream? To answer this question, we present the first data oblivious sketch for logistic regression. Our sketch can be computed in input sparsity time over a turnstile data stream and reduces the size of a $d$-dimensional data set from $n$ to only $\operatorname{poly}(μd\log n)$ weighted points, where $μ$ is a useful parameter which captures the complexity of compressing the data. Solving (weighted) logistic regression on the sketch gives an $O(\log n)$-approximation to the original problem on the full data set. We also show how to obtain an $O(1)$-approximation with slight modifications. Our sketches are fast, simple, easy to implement, and our experiments demonstrate their practicality.