Floris Jansen

2papers

2 Papers

IVMar 15, 2022
A Noise-level-aware Framework for PET Image Denoising

Ye Li, Jianan Cui, Junyu Chen et al.

In PET, the amount of relative (signal-dependent) noise present in different body regions can be significantly different and is inherently related to the number of counts present in that region. The number of counts in a region depends, in principle and among other factors, on the total administered activity, scanner sensitivity, image acquisition duration, radiopharmaceutical tracer uptake in the region, and patient local body morphometry surrounding the region. In theory, less amount of denoising operations is needed to denoise a high-count (low relative noise) image than images a low-count (high relative noise) image, and vice versa. The current deep-learning-based methods for PET image denoising are predominantly trained on image appearance only and have no special treatment for images of different noise levels. Our hypothesis is that by explicitly providing the local relative noise level of the input image to a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN), the DCNN can outperform itself trained on image appearance only. To this end, we propose a noise-level-aware framework denoising framework that allows embedding of local noise level into a DCNN. The proposed is trained and tested on 30 and 15 patient PET images acquired on a GE Discovery MI PET/CT system. Our experiments showed that the increases in both PSNR and SSIM from our backbone network with relative noise level embedding (NLE) versus the same network without NLE were statistically significant with p<0.001, and the proposed method significantly outperformed a strong baseline method by a large margin.

SEJan 15, 2021
TrustSECO: An Interview Survey into Software Trust

Floris Jansen, Slinger Jansen, Fang Hou

The software ecosystem is a trust-rich part of the world. Collaboratively, software engineers trust major hubs in the ecosystem, such as package managers, repository services, and programming language ecosystems. This trust, however, is often broken by vulnerabilities, ransomware, and abuse from malignant actors. But what is trust? In this paper we explore, through twelve in-depth interviews with software engineers, how they perceive trust in their daily work. From the interviews we conclude three things. First, software engineers make a distinction between an adoption factor and a trust factor when selecting a package. Secondly, while in literature mostly technical factors are considered as the main trust factors, the software engineers in this study conclude that organizational factors are more important. Finally, we find that different kinds of software engineers require different views on trust, and that it is impossible to create one unified perception of trust. Keywords: software ecosystem trust, empirical software engineering, TrustSECO, external software adoption, cross-sectional exploratory interview analysis, trust perception.