Timothée Mathieu

Debabrota Basu, Odalric-Ambrym Maillard, Timothée Mathieu

We study the corrupted bandit problem, i.e. a stochastic multi-armed bandit problem with $k$ unknown reward distributions, which are heavy-tailed and corrupted by a history-independent adversary or Nature. To be specific, the reward obtained by playing an arm comes from corresponding heavy-tailed reward distribution with probability $1-\varepsilon \in (0.5,1]$ and an arbitrary corruption distribution of unbounded support with probability $\varepsilon \in [0,0.5)$. First, we provide $\textit{a problem-dependent lower bound on the regret}$ of any corrupted bandit algorithm. The lower bounds indicate that the corrupted bandit problem is harder than the classical stochastic bandit problem with sub-Gaussian or heavy-tail rewards. Following that, we propose a novel UCB-type algorithm for corrupted bandits, namely HubUCB, that builds on Huber's estimator for robust mean estimation. Leveraging a novel concentration inequality of Huber's estimator, we prove that HubUCB achieves a near-optimal regret upper bound. Since computing Huber's estimator has quadratic complexity, we further introduce a sequential version of Huber's estimator that exhibits linear complexity. We leverage this sequential estimator to design SeqHubUCB that enjoys similar regret guarantees while reducing the computational burden. Finally, we experimentally illustrate the efficiency of HubUCB and SeqHubUCB in solving corrupted bandits for different reward distributions and different levels of corruptions.

Shubhada Agrawal, Timothée Mathieu, Debabrota Basu et al.

We investigate the regret-minimisation problem in a multi-armed bandit setting with arbitrary corruptions. Similar to the classical setup, the agent receives rewards generated independently from the distribution of the arm chosen at each time. However, these rewards are not directly observed. Instead, with a fixed $\varepsilon\in (0,\frac{1}{2})$, the agent observes a sample from the chosen arm's distribution with probability $1-\varepsilon$, or from an arbitrary corruption distribution with probability $\varepsilon$. Importantly, we impose no assumptions on these corruption distributions, which can be unbounded. In this setting, accommodating potentially unbounded corruptions, we establish a problem-dependent lower bound on regret for a given family of arm distributions. We introduce CRIMED, an asymptotically-optimal algorithm that achieves the exact lower bound on regret for bandits with Gaussian distributions with known variance. Additionally, we provide a finite-sample analysis of CRIMED's regret performance. Notably, CRIMED can effectively handle corruptions with $\varepsilon$ values as high as $\frac{1}{2}$. Furthermore, we develop a tight concentration result for medians in the presence of arbitrary corruptions, even with $\varepsilon$ values up to $\frac{1}{2}$, which may be of independent interest. We also discuss an extension of the algorithm for handling misspecification in Gaussian model.

Timothée Mathieu, Riccardo Della Vecchia, Alena Shilova et al.

Recently, the scientific community has questioned the statistical reproducibility of many empirical results, especially in the field of machine learning. To contribute to the resolution of this reproducibility crisis, we propose a theoretically sound methodology for comparing the performance of a set of algorithms. We exemplify our methodology in Deep Reinforcement Learning (Deep RL). The performance of one execution of a Deep RL algorithm is a random variable. Therefore, several independent executions are needed to evaluate its performance. When comparing algorithms with random performance, a major question concerns the number of executions to perform to ensure that the result of the comparison is theoretically sound. Researchers in Deep RL often use less than 5 independent executions to compare algorithms: we claim that this is not enough in general. Moreover, when comparing more than 2 algorithms at once, we have to use a multiple tests procedure to preserve low error guarantees. We introduce AdaStop, a new statistical test based on multiple group sequential tests. When used to compare algorithms, AdaStop adapts the number of executions to stop as early as possible while ensuring that enough information has been collected to distinguish algorithms that have different score distributions. We prove theoretically that AdaStop has a low probability of making a (family-wise) error. We illustrate the effectiveness of AdaStop in various use-cases, including toy examples and Deep RL algorithms on challenging Mujoco environments. AdaStop is the first statistical test fitted to this sort of comparisons: it is both a significant contribution to statistics, and an important contribution to computational studies performed in reinforcement learning and in other domains.

Stanislav Minsker, Timothée Mathieu

This paper investigates robust versions of the general empirical risk minimization algorithm, one of the core techniques underlying modern statistical methods. Success of the empirical risk minimization is based on the fact that for a "well-behaved" stochastic process $\left\{ f(X), \ f\in \mathcal F\right\}$ indexed by a class of functions $f\in \mathcal F$, averages $\frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^N f(X_j)$ evaluated over a sample $X_1,\ldots,X_N$ of i.i.d. copies of $X$ provide good approximation to the expectations $\mathbb E f(X)$ uniformly over large classes $f\in \mathcal F$. However, this might no longer be true if the marginal distributions of the process are heavy-tailed or if the sample contains outliers. We propose a version of empirical risk minimization based on the idea of replacing sample averages by robust proxies of the expectation, and obtain high-confidence bounds for the excess risk of resulting estimators. In particular, we show that the excess risk of robust estimators can converge to $0$ at fast rates with respect to the sample size. We discuss implications of the main results to the linear and logistic regression problems, and evaluate the numerical performance of proposed methods on simulated and real data.