Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama

Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama

The number of local model-agnostic explanation techniques proposed has grown rapidly recently. One main reason is that the bar for developing new explainability techniques is low due to the lack of optimal evaluation measures. Without rigorous measures, it is hard to have concrete evidence of whether the new explanation techniques can significantly outperform their predecessors. Our study proposes a new taxonomy for evaluating local explanations: robustness, evaluation using ground truth from synthetic datasets and interpretable models, model randomization, and human-grounded evaluation. Using this proposed taxonomy, we highlight that all categories of evaluation methods, except those based on the ground truth from interpretable models, suffer from a problem we call the "blame problem." In our study, we argue that this category of evaluation measure is a more reasonable method for evaluating local model-agnostic explanations. However, we show that even this category of evaluation measures has further limitations. The evaluation of local explanations remains an open research problem.

Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama, Judith Butepage

Local explanations of learning-to-rank (LTR) models are thought to extract the most important features that contribute to the ranking predicted by the LTR model for a single data point. Evaluating the accuracy of such explanations is challenging since the ground truth feature importance scores are not available for most modern LTR models. In this work, we propose a systematic evaluation technique for explanations of LTR models. Instead of using black-box models, such as neural networks, we propose to focus on tree-based LTR models, from which we can extract the ground truth feature importance scores using decision paths. Once extracted, we can directly compare the ground truth feature importance scores to the feature importance scores generated with explanation techniques. We compare two recently proposed explanation techniques for LTR models when using decision trees and gradient boosting models on the MQ2008 dataset. We show that the explanation accuracy in these techniques can largely vary depending on the explained model and even which data point is explained.

Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama, Judith Butepage, Pierre Geurts et al.

Evaluating explanation techniques using human subjects is costly, time-consuming and can lead to subjectivity in the assessments. To evaluate the accuracy of local explanations, we require access to the true feature importance scores for a given instance. However, the prediction function of a model usually does not decompose into linear additive terms that indicate how much a feature contributes to the output. In this work, we suggest to instead focus on the log odds ratio (LOR) of the prediction function, which naturally decomposes into additive terms for logistic regression and naive Bayes. We demonstrate how we can benchmark different explanation techniques in terms of their similarity to the LOR scores based on our proposed approach. In the experiments, we compare prominent local explanation techniques and find that the performance of the techniques can depend on the underlying model, the dataset, which data point is explained, the normalization of the data and the similarity metric.

Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama, Henrik Boström

LIME is a popular approach for explaining a black-box prediction through an interpretable model that is trained on instances in the vicinity of the predicted instance. To generate these instances, LIME randomly selects a subset of the non-zero features of the predicted instance. After that, the perturbed instances are fed into the black-box model to obtain labels for these, which are then used for training the interpretable model. In this study, we present a systematic evaluation of the interpretable models that are output by LIME on the two use-cases that were considered in the original paper introducing the approach; text classification and object detection. The investigation shows that the perturbation and labeling phases result in both data and label shift. In addition, we study the correlation between the shift and the fidelity of the interpretable model and show that in certain cases the shift negatively correlates with the fidelity. Based on these findings, it is argued that there is a need for a new sampling approach that mitigates the shift in the LIME's framework.

Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama, Mehdi Toloo, Nezer Jacob Zaidenberg

In order to find hyperparameters for a machine learning model, algorithms such as grid search or random search are used over the space of possible values of the models hyperparameters. These search algorithms opt the solution that minimizes a specific cost function. In language models, perplexity is one of the most popular cost functions. In this study, we propose a fractional nonlinear programming model that finds the optimal perplexity value. The special structure of the model allows us to approximate it by a linear programming model that can be solved using the well-known simplex algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to use optimization techniques to find perplexity values in the language modeling literature. We apply our model to find hyperparameters of a language model and compare it to the grid search algorithm. Furthermore, we illustrating that it results in lower perplexity values. We perform this experiment on a real-world dataset from SwiftKey to validate our proposed approach.

Amir Hossein Akhavan Rahnama

Big data trend has enforced the data-centric systems to have continuous fast data streams. In recent years, real-time analytics on stream data has formed into a new research field, which aims to answer queries about what-is-happening-now with a negligible delay. The real challenge with real-time stream data processing is that it is impossible to store instances of data, and therefore online analytical algorithms are utilized. To perform real-time analytics, pre-processing of data should be performed in a way that only a short summary of stream is stored in main memory. In addition, due to high speed of arrival, average processing time for each instance of data should be in such a way that incoming instances are not lost without being captured. Lastly, the learner needs to provide high analytical accuracy measures. Sentinel is a distributed system written in Java that aims to solve this challenge by enforcing both the processing and learning process to be done in distributed form. Sentinel is built on top of Apache Storm, a distributed computing platform. Sentinels learner, Vertical Hoeffding Tree, is a parallel decision tree-learning algorithm based on the VFDT, with ability of enabling parallel classification in distributed environments. Sentinel also uses SpaceSaving to keep a summary of the data stream and stores its summary in a synopsis data structure. Application of Sentinel on Twitter Public Stream API is shown and the results are discussed.