Cory Braker Scott

LG
3papers
41citations
Novelty48%
AI Score26

3 Papers

GRMar 2, 2022Code
Differentiable Iterated Function Systems

Cory Braker Scott

This preliminary paper presents initial explorations in rendering Iterated Function System (IFS) fractals using a differentiable rendering pipeline. Differentiable rendering is a recent innovation at the intersection of computer graphics and machine learning. A fractal rendering pipeline composed of differentiable operations opens up many possibilities for generating fractals that meet particular criteria. In this paper I demonstrate this pipeline by generating IFS fractals with fixed points that resemble a given target image - a famous problem known as the \emph{inverse IFS problem}. The main contributions of this work are as follows: 1) I demonstrate (and make code available) this rendering pipeline; 2) I discuss some of the nuances and pitfalls in gradient-descent-based optimization over fractal structures; 3) I discuss best practices to address some of these pitfalls; and finally 4) I discuss directions for further experiments to validate the technique.

LGJun 29, 2021
Diff2Dist: Learning Spectrally Distinct Edge Functions, with Applications to Cell Morphology Analysis

Cory Braker Scott, Eric Mjolsness, Diane Oyen et al.

We present a method for learning "spectrally descriptive" edge weights for graphs. We generalize a previously known distance measure on graphs (Graph Diffusion Distance), thereby allowing it to be tuned to minimize an arbitrary loss function. Because all steps involved in calculating this modified GDD are differentiable, we demonstrate that it is possible for a small neural network model to learn edge weights which minimize loss. GDD alone does not effectively discriminate between graphs constructed from shoot apical meristem images of wild-type vs. mutant \emph{Arabidopsis thaliana} specimens. However, training edge weights and kernel parameters with contrastive loss produces a learned distance metric with large margins between these graph categories. We demonstrate this by showing improved performance of a simple k-nearest-neighbors classifier on the learned distance matrix. We also demonstrate a further application of this method to biological image analysis: once trained, we use our model to compute the distance between the biological graphs and a set of graphs output by a cell division simulator. This allows us to identify simulation parameter regimes which are similar to each class of graph in our original dataset.

LGNov 20, 2020
StressNet: Deep Learning to Predict Stress With Fracture Propagation in Brittle Materials

Yinan Wang, Diane Oyen, Weihong et al.

Catastrophic failure in brittle materials is often due to the rapid growth and coalescence of cracks aided by high internal stresses. Hence, accurate prediction of maximum internal stress is critical to predicting time to failure and improving the fracture resistance and reliability of materials. Existing high-fidelity methods, such as the Finite-Discrete Element Model (FDEM), are limited by their high computational cost. Therefore, to reduce computational cost while preserving accuracy, a novel deep learning model, "StressNet," is proposed to predict the entire sequence of maximum internal stress based on fracture propagation and the initial stress data. More specifically, the Temporal Independent Convolutional Neural Network (TI-CNN) is designed to capture the spatial features of fractures like fracture path and spall regions, and the Bidirectional Long Short-term Memory (Bi-LSTM) Network is adapted to capture the temporal features. By fusing these features, the evolution in time of the maximum internal stress can be accurately predicted. Moreover, an adaptive loss function is designed by dynamically integrating the Mean Squared Error (MSE) and the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), to reflect the fluctuations in maximum internal stress. After training, the proposed model is able to compute accurate multi-step predictions of maximum internal stress in approximately 20 seconds, as compared to the FDEM run time of 4 hours, with an average MAPE of 2% relative to test data.