Ruidong Wu

CL
3papers
140citations
Novelty53%
AI Score29

3 Papers

LGMar 2, 2022
FastFold: Reducing AlphaFold Training Time from 11 Days to 67 Hours

Shenggan Cheng, Xuanlei Zhao, Guangyang Lu et al. · berkeley

Protein structure prediction helps to understand gene translation and protein function, which is of growing interest and importance in structural biology. The AlphaFold model, which used transformer architecture to achieve atomic-level accuracy in protein structure prediction, was a significant breakthrough. However, training and inference of the AlphaFold model are challenging due to its high computation and memory cost. In this work, we present FastFold, an efficient implementation of AlphaFold for both training and inference. We propose Dynamic Axial Parallelism and Duality Async Operations to improve the scaling efficiency of model parallelism. Besides, AutoChunk is proposed to reduce memory cost by over 80% during inference by automatically determining the chunk strategy. Experimental results show that FastFold reduces overall training time from 11 days to 67 hours and achieves 7.5X - 9.5X speedup for long-sequence inference. Furthermore, we scale FastFold to 512 GPUs and achieve an aggregate throughput of 6.02 PetaFLOP/s with 90.1% parallel efficiency.

QMJul 1, 2024
FAFE: Immune Complex Modeling with Geodesic Distance Loss on Noisy Group Frames

Ruidong Wu, Ruihan Guo, Rui Wang et al.

Despite the striking success of general protein folding models such as AlphaFold2(AF2, Jumper et al. (2021)), the accurate computational modeling of antibody-antigen complexes remains a challenging task. In this paper, we first analyze AF2's primary loss function, known as the Frame Aligned Point Error (FAPE), and raise a previously overlooked issue that FAPE tends to face gradient vanishing problem on high-rotational-error targets. To address this fundamental limitation, we propose a novel geodesic loss called Frame Aligned Frame Error (FAFE, denoted as F2E to distinguish from FAPE), which enables the model to better optimize both the rotational and translational errors between two frames. We then prove that F2E can be reformulated as a group-aware geodesic loss, which translates the optimization of the residue-to-residue error to optimizing group-to-group geodesic frame distance. By fine-tuning AF2 with our proposed new loss function, we attain a correct rate of 52.3\% (DockQ $>$ 0.23) on an evaluation set and 43.8\% correct rate on a subset with low homology, with substantial improvement over AF2 by 182\% and 100\% respectively.

CLJun 18, 2024
DART-Math: Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning for Mathematical Problem-Solving

Yuxuan Tong, Xiwen Zhang, Rui Wang et al.

Solving mathematical problems requires advanced reasoning abilities and presents notable challenges for large language models. Previous works usually synthesize data from proprietary models to augment existing datasets, followed by instruction tuning to achieve top-tier results. However, our analysis of these datasets reveals severe biases towards easy queries, with frequent failures to generate any correct response for the most challenging queries. Hypothesizing that difficult queries are crucial to learn complex reasoning, we propose Difficulty-Aware Rejection Tuning (DART), a method that allocates difficult queries more trials during the synthesis phase, enabling more extensive training on difficult samples. Utilizing DART, we have created new datasets for mathematical problem-solving that focus more on difficult queries and are substantially smaller than previous ones. Remarkably, our synthesis process solely relies on a 7B-sized open-weight model, without reliance on the commonly used proprietary GPT-4. We fine-tune various base models on our datasets ranging from 7B to 70B in size, resulting in a series of strong models called DART-MATH. In comprehensive in-domain and out-of-domain evaluation on 6 mathematical benchmarks, DART-MATH outperforms vanilla rejection tuning significantly, being superior or comparable to previous arts, despite using much smaller datasets and no proprietary models. Furthermore, our results position our synthetic datasets as the most effective and cost-efficient publicly available resources for advancing mathematical problem-solving.