Julian Koch

h-index7
2papers
193citations

2 Papers

5.9CVJul 24, 2023
Industrial Segment Anything -- a Case Study in Aircraft Manufacturing, Intralogistics, Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul

Keno Moenck, Arne Wendt, Philipp Prünte et al.

Deploying deep learning-based applications in specialized domains like the aircraft production industry typically suffers from the training data availability problem. Only a few datasets represent non-everyday objects, situations, and tasks. Recent advantages in research around Vision Foundation Models (VFM) opened a new area of tasks and models with high generalization capabilities in non-semantic and semantic predictions. As recently demonstrated by the Segment Anything Project, exploiting VFM's zero-shot capabilities is a promising direction in tackling the boundaries spanned by data, context, and sensor variety. Although, investigating its application within specific domains is subject to ongoing research. This paper contributes here by surveying applications of the SAM in aircraft production-specific use cases. We include manufacturing, intralogistics, as well as maintenance, repair, and overhaul processes, also representing a variety of other neighboring industrial domains. Besides presenting the various use cases, we further discuss the injection of domain knowledge.

6.0HCMay 8
Hot Wire 5D+: Evaluating Cognitive and Motor Trade-offs of Visual Feedback for 5D Augmented Reality Trajectories

Christian Masuhr, Julian Koch, Arne Wendt et al.

Augmented Reality (AR) is increasingly utilized to guide users through complex spatial tasks in domains such as manufacturing, non-destructive testing, and surgery. These applications often require strict compliance with 5D+ trajectories using rotation-symmetric tools (3D position, 2D orientation, and movement speed). However, the sensori-motor baselines of untrained users during these multidimensional tracing tasks, along with the cognitive-motor trade-offs induced by varying visual feedback paradigms, remain underexplored. We present a controlled within-subjects user study (N=30) evaluating three distinct AR UI concepts for trajectory guidance, both with and without explicit orientation constraints. We analyzed spatial, orientational, and speed compliance based on the internal AR tracking, which was validated against a high-precision external optical tracking system to rule out hardware drift. By segmenting the execution into transient and steady-state phases and applying Aligned Rank Transform (ART) ANOVA, we isolated the interaction effects between visual design and task complexity. Alongside subjective metrics (NASA-TLX, SUS), our results establish conservative performance baselines for novice users performing freehand 5D trajectory following. We reveal orientation-induced cognitive-motor trade-offs and identify mitigating UI synergies. Ultimately, we provide empirical baselines and actionable design guidelines for developing effective AR guidance systems.