72.3OCMay 29
Clustering-enhanced adaptive Benders decomposition for energy systems planning optimizationJun Wen Law, Dharik S. Mallapragada
High-resolution energy system capacity expansion models (CEMs) for energy transition planning often result in large-scale mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulations. Benders decomposition (BD) offers a scalable solution approach by iteratively solving a master problem (MP) for investment decisions and multiple subproblems (SPs) for operational decisions. However, accumulated Benders cuts generated by the SPs can make MP solution a major computational bottleneck. Incomplete SP parallelization can also introduce further bottlenecks when SPs exceed available CPUs. We develop clustering-enhanced BD methods to address these challenges, by using clustering to group similar SPs for: a) aggregated Benders cut construction and b) identification of representative SPs to be solved most frequently. For grouped-cuts, we examine two adaptive formulations based on dual variables and a fixed-grouping formulation based on exogenous time-series inputs. We evaluate these methods in an electricity-sector CEM across varying system sizes, temporal SP lengths, inter-SP coupling strengths represented by CO2 policy, computational resources, and stochastic settings. Relative to a benchmark regularized multi-cut formulation, adaptive grouped cuts outperform fixed grouping and provide substantial benefits under weak inter-temporal coupling. The largest gains occur in larger systems with shorter SP horizons, where the MP accounts for a greater share of runtime. Their effectiveness declines under strong inter-temporal coupling, such as annual CO2 emissions limits, where the benchmark multi-cut performs best. The representative-SP method outperforms the benchmark under limited parallelization when SP solution dominates runtime. Overall, the preferred BD strategy depends on inter-SP coupling strength and whether computational burden lies in the MP or the SPs.
50.5SYMay 20
Emissions and cost tradeoffs of time-matched clean electricity procurement under inter-annual weather variability -- case study of hydrogen productionMichael Giovanniello, Dharik S. Mallapragada
Regulators and voluntary corporate sustainability efforts are increasingly adopting time-matching requirements (TMRs) for clean electricity procurement for large loads, such as data centers, and electricity-intensive fuel production, such as hydrogen. We use a stochastic capacity expansion model (CEM) framework to assess how inter-annual weather variability affects the cost, composition, and emissions of procurement-driven infrastructure to meet annual and hourly TMRs using the case study of a grid-connected hydrogen producer in Texas. Our approach, which relies on co-optimizing investments and hourly operations over nine weather scenarios, reveals that hourly TMR comes at a higher cost premium compared to annual TMR than previously estimated by single-scenario deterministic modeling, while emissions outcomes remain directionally consistent. Demand flexibility and partial hourly TMR (80-90%) lower the cost premium while preserving emissions benefits. We further examine how binding renewable portfolio standards (RPS) interact with TMR costs and emissions outcomes. When an RPS is applied to non-H2 electricity demand, annual TMR reduces emissions comparably to hourly TMR at a lower cost. Incorporating H2-related electricity demand directly into the RPS constraint, rather than imposing a separate TMR, achieves similar emissions outcomes at still lower cost, suggesting that TMR-based clean electricity procurement, particularly hourly matching, offers limited additional value in regions with stringent grid decarbonization policies.
LGApr 28, 2022
Representative period selection for power system planning using autoencoder-based dimensionality reductionMarc Barbar, Dharik S. Mallapragada
Power sector capacity expansion models (CEMs) that are used for studying future low-carbon grid scenarios must incorporate detailed representation of grid operations. Often CEMs are formulated to model grid operations over representative periods that are sampled from the original input data using clustering algorithms. However, such representative period selection (RPS) methods are limited by the declining efficacy of the clustering algorithm with increasing dimensionality of the input data and do not consider the relative importance of input data variations on CEM outcomes. Here, we propose a RPS method that addresses these limitations by incorporating dimensionality reduction, accomplished via neural network based autoencoders, prior to clustering. Such dimensionality reduction not only improves the performance of the clustering algorithm, but also facilitates using additional features, such as estimated outputs produced from parallel solutions of simplified versions of the CEM for each disjoint period in the input data (e.g. 1 week). The impact of incorporating dimensionality reduction as part of RPS methods is quantified through the error in outcomes of the corresponding reduced-space CEM vs. the full space CEM. Extensive numerical experimentation across various networks and range of technology and policy scenarios establish the superiority of the dimensionality-reduction based RPS methods.
SOC-PHNov 24, 2025
Decarbonization pathways for liquid fuels: A multi-sector energy system perspectiveJun Wen Law, Bryan K. Mignone, Dharik S. Mallapragada
Low-carbon liquid fuels play a key role in energy system decarbonization scenarios. This study uses a multi-sector capacity expansion model of the contiguous United States to examine fuels production in deeply decarbonized energy systems. Our analysis evaluates how the shares of biofuels, synthetic fuels, and fossil liquid fuels change under varying assumptions about resource constraints (biomass and CO2 sequestration availability), fuel demand distributions, and supply flexibility to produce different fuel products. Across all scenarios examined, biofuels provide a substantial share of liquid fuel supply, while synthetic fuels deploy only when biomass or CO2 sequestration is assumed to be more limited. Fossil liquid fuels remain in all scenarios examined, primarily driven by the extent to which their emissions can be offset with removals. Limiting biomass increases biogenic CO2 capture within biofuel pathways, while limiting sequestration availability increases the share of captured atmospheric (including biogenic) carbon directed toward utilization for synthetic fuel production. While varying assumptions about liquid fuel demand distributions and fuel product supply flexibility alter competition among individual fuel production technologies, broader energy system outcomes are robust to these assumptions. Biomass and CO2 sequestration availability are key drivers of energy system outcomes in deeply decarbonized energy systems.