LGApr 22, 2022Code
Federated Learning Enables Big Data for Rare Cancer Boundary DetectionSarthak Pati, Ujjwal Baid, Brandon Edwards et al.
Although machine learning (ML) has shown promise in numerous domains, there are concerns about generalizability to out-of-sample data. This is currently addressed by centrally sharing ample, and importantly diverse, data from multiple sites. However, such centralization is challenging to scale (or even not feasible) due to various limitations. Federated ML (FL) provides an alternative to train accurate and generalizable ML models, by only sharing numerical model updates. Here we present findings from the largest FL study to-date, involving data from 71 healthcare institutions across 6 continents, to generate an automatic tumor boundary detector for the rare disease of glioblastoma, utilizing the largest dataset of such patients ever used in the literature (25,256 MRI scans from 6,314 patients). We demonstrate a 33% improvement over a publicly trained model to delineate the surgically targetable tumor, and 23% improvement over the tumor's entire extent. We anticipate our study to: 1) enable more studies in healthcare informed by large and diverse data, ensuring meaningful results for rare diseases and underrepresented populations, 2) facilitate further quantitative analyses for glioblastoma via performance optimization of our consensus model for eventual public release, and 3) demonstrate the effectiveness of FL at such scale and task complexity as a paradigm shift for multi-site collaborations, alleviating the need for data sharing.
IVAug 13, 2022Code
Machine Learning Based Radiomics for Glial Tumor Classification and Comparison with Volumetric AnalysisSevcan Turk, Kaya Oguz, Mehmet Orman et al.
Purpose; The purpose of this study is to classify glial tumors into grade II, III and IV categories noninvasively by application of machine learning to multi-modal MRI features in comparison with volumetric analysis. Methods; We retrospectively studied 57 glioma patients with pre and postcontrast T1 weighted, T2 weighted, FLAIR images, and ADC maps acquired on a 3T MRI. The tumors were segmented into enhancing and nonenhancing portions, tumor necrosis, cyst and edema using semiautomated segmentation of ITK-SNAP open source tool. We measured total tumor volume, enhancing-nonenhancing tumor, edema, necrosis volume and the ratios to the total tumor volume. Training of a support vector machine (SVM) classifier and artificial neural network (ANN) was performed with labeled data designed to answer the question of interest. Specificity, sensitivity, and AUC of the predictions were computed by means of ROC analysis. Differences in continuous measures between groups were assessed by using Kruskall Wallis, with post hoc Dunn correction for multiple comparisons. Results; When we compared the volume ratios between groups, there was statistically significant difference between grade IV and grade II-III glial tumors. Edema and tumor necrosis volume ratios for grade IV glial tumors were higher than that of grade II and III. Volumetric ratio analysis could not distinguish grade II and III tumors successfully. However, SVM and ANN correctly classified each group with accuracies up to 98% and 96%. Conclusion; Application of machine learning methods to MRI features can be used to classify brain tumors noninvasively and more readily in clinical settings.