Brice Huang

Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li et al.

We consider the classic question of state tomography: given copies of an unknown quantum state $ρ\in\mathbb{C}^{d\times d}$, output $\widehatρ$ which is close to $ρ$ in some sense, e.g. trace distance or fidelity. When one is allowed to make coherent measurements entangled across all copies, $Θ(d^2/ε^2)$ copies are necessary and sufficient to get trace distance $ε$. Unfortunately, the protocols achieving this rate incur large quantum memory overheads that preclude implementation on near-term devices. On the other hand, the best known protocol using incoherent (single-copy) measurements uses $O(d^3/ε^2)$ copies, and multiple papers have posed it as an open question to understand whether or not this rate is tight. In this work, we fully resolve this question, by showing that any protocol using incoherent measurements, even if they are chosen adaptively, requires $Ω(d^3/ε^2)$ copies, matching the best known upper bound. We do so by a new proof technique which directly bounds the ``tilt'' of the posterior distribution after measurements, which yields a surprisingly short proof of our lower bound, and which we believe may be of independent interest. While this implies that adaptivity does not help for tomography with respect to trace distance, we show that it actually does help for tomography with respect to infidelity. We give an adaptive algorithm that outputs a state which is $γ$-close in infidelity to $ρ$ using only $\tilde{O}(d^3/γ)$ copies, which is optimal for incoherent measurements. In contrast, it is known that any nonadaptive algorithm requires $Ω(d^3/γ^2)$ copies. While it is folklore that in $2$ dimensions, one can achieve a scaling of $O(1/γ)$, to the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first to achieve the optimal rate in all dimensions.

Sitan Chen, Brice Huang, Jerry Li et al.

We consider the problem of quantum state certification, where we are given the description of a mixed state $σ\in \mathbb{C}^{d \times d}$, $n$ copies of a mixed state $ρ\in \mathbb{C}^{d \times d}$, and $\varepsilon > 0$, and we are asked to determine whether $ρ= σ$ or whether $\| ρ- σ\|_1 > \varepsilon$. When $σ$ is the maximally mixed state $\frac{1}{d} I_d$, this is known as mixedness testing. We focus on algorithms which use incoherent measurements, i.e. which only measure one copy of $ρ$ at a time. Unlike those that use entangled, multi-copy measurements, these can be implemented without persistent quantum memory and thus represent a large class of protocols that can be run on current or near-term devices. For mixedness testing, there is a folklore algorithm which uses incoherent measurements and only needs $O(d^{3/2} / \varepsilon^2)$ copies. The algorithm is non-adaptive, that is, its measurements are fixed ahead of time, and is known to be optimal for non-adaptive algorithms. However, when the algorithm can make arbitrary incoherent measurements, the best known lower bound is only $Ω(d^{4/3} / \varepsilon^2)$ [Bubeck-Chen-Li '20], and it has been an outstanding open problem to close this polynomial gap. In this work, 1) we settle the copy complexity of mixedness testing with incoherent measurements and show that $Ω(d^{3/2} / \varepsilon^2)$ copies are necessary, and 2) we show the instance-optimal bounds for state certification to general $σ$ first derived by [Chen-Li-O'Donnell '21] for non-adaptive measurements also hold for arbitrary incoherent measurements. Qualitatively, our results say that adaptivity does not help at all for these problems. Our results are based on new techniques that allow us to reduce the problem to understanding certain matrix martingales, which we believe may be of independent interest.

Shuyang Gong, Brice Huang, Shuangping Li et al.

We study the binary perceptron, a random constraint satisfaction problem that asks to find a Boolean vector in the intersection of independently chosen random halfspaces. A striking feature of this model is that at every positive constraint density, it is expected that a $1-o_N(1)$ fraction of solutions are \emph{strongly isolated}, i.e. separated from all others by Hamming distance $Ω(N)$. At the same time, efficient algorithms are known to find solutions at certain positive constraint densities. This raises a natural question: can any isolated solution be algorithmically visible? We answer this in the negative: no algorithm whose output is stable under a tiny Gaussian resampling of the disorder can \emph{reliably} locate isolated solutions. We show that any stable algorithm has success probability at most $\frac{3\sqrt{17}-9}{4}+o_N(1)\leq 0.84233$. Furthermore, every stable algorithm that finds a solution with probability $1-o_N(1)$ finds an isolated solution with probability $o_N(1)$. The class of stable algorithms we consider includes degree-$D$ polynomials up to $D\leq o(N/\log N)$; under the low-degree heuristic \cite{hopkins2018statistical}, this suggests that locating strongly isolated solutions requires running time $\exp(\widetildeΘ(N))$. Our proof does not use the overlap gap property. Instead, we show via Pitt's correlation inequality that after a random perturbation of the disorder, the number of solutions located close to a pre-existing isolated solution cannot concentrate at $1$.

Brice Huang, Mark Sellke

It is a folklore belief in the theory of spin glasses and disordered systems that out-of-equilibrium dynamics fail to find stable local optima exhibiting e.g. local strict convexity on physical time-scales. In the context of the Sherrington--Kirkpatrick spin glass, Behrens-Arpino-Kivva-Zdeborová and Minzer-Sah-Sawhney have recently conjectured that this obstruction may be inherent to all efficient algorithms, despite the existence of exponentially many such optima throughout the landscape. We prove this search problem exhibits strong low degree hardness for polynomial algorithms of degree $D\leq o(N)$: any such algorithm has probability $o(1)$ to output a stable local optimum. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result to prove that even constant-degree polynomials have probability $o(1)$ to solve a random search problem without planted structure. To prove this, we develop a general-purpose enhancement of the ensemble overlap gap property, and as a byproduct improve previous results on spin glass optimization, maximum independent set, random $k$-SAT, and the Ising perceptron to strong low degree hardness. Finally for spherical spin glasses with no external field, we prove that Langevin dynamics does not find stable local optima within dimension-free time.

Guy Bresler, Brice Huang

Let $Φ$ be a uniformly random $k$-SAT formula with $n$ variables and $m$ clauses. We study the algorithmic task of finding a satisfying assignment of $Φ$. It is known that satisfying assignments exist with high probability up to clause density $m/n = 2^k \log 2 - \frac12 (\log 2 + 1) + o_k(1)$, while the best polynomial-time algorithm known, the Fix algorithm of Coja-Oghlan, finds a satisfying assignment at the much lower clause density $(1 - o_k(1)) 2^k \log k / k$. This prompts the question: is it possible to efficiently find a satisfying assignment at higher clause densities? We prove that the class of low degree polynomial algorithms cannot find a satisfying assignment at clause density $(1 + o_k(1)) κ^* 2^k \log k / k$ for a universal constant $κ^* \approx 4.911$. This class encompasses Fix, message passing algorithms including Belief and Survey Propagation guided decimation (with bounded or mildly growing number of rounds), and local algorithms on the factor graph. This is the first hardness result for any class of algorithms at clause density within a constant factor of that achieved by Fix. Our proof establishes and leverages a new many-way overlap gap property tailored to random $k$-SAT.