7.3SEMar 18
In Perfect Harmony: Orchestrating Causality in Actor-Based SystemsVladyslav Mikytiv, Bernardo Toninho, Carla Ferreira
Runtime verification has gained popularity as a lightweight approach for increasing assurance in systems under scrutiny. Performing runtime checks enables dynamic monitoring and alerts for unexpected behavior, thereby improving reliability and correctness. Actor-based systems present significant challenges for runtime verification. Properties frequently span multiple actors with complex causal dependencies, while nondeterministic message interleavings can obscure execution semantics. Moreover, most existing monitoring tools are designed for single-process behavior. This paper presents ACTORCHESTRA, a runtime verification framework for Erlang that automatically tracks causality across multi-actor interactions. The framework instruments Erlang systems that comply with OTP guidelines via targeted code injection. This method establishes the orchestration infrastructure required to track causal relationships between actors without requiring manual modifications to the target system. To ease the specification of multi-actor properties, the framework provides WALTZ, a specification language that automatically compiles properties into executable Erlang monitors that integrate with the instrumented system. Three case studies demonstrate ACTORCHESTRA's effectiveness in detecting complex behavioral violations in real-world actor systems. A performance evaluation quantifies the runtime overhead of the monitoring infrastructure and analyzes the trade-offs between added safety guarantees and execution costs.
1.2DCMay 12, 2015
Preventing Atomicity Violations with ContractsDiogo G. Sousa, Ricardo J. Dias, Carla Ferreira et al.
Software developers are expected to protect concurrent accesses to shared regions of memory with some mutual exclusion primitive that ensures atomicity properties to a sequence of program statements. This approach prevents data races but may fail to provide all necessary correctness properties.The composition of correlated atomic operations without further synchronization may cause atomicity violations. Atomic violations may be avoided by grouping the correlated atomic regions in a single larger atomic scope. Concurrent programs are particularly prone to atomicity violations when they use services provided by third party packages or modules, since the programmer may fail to identify which services are correlated. In this paper we propose to use contracts for concurrency, where the developer of a module writes a set of contract terms that specify which methods are correlated and must be executed in the same atomic scope. These contracts are then used to verify the correctness of the main program with respect to the usage of the module(s). If a contract is well defined and complete, and the main program respects it, then the program is safe from atomicity violations with respect to that module. We also propose a static analysis based methodology to verify contracts for concurrency that we applied to some real-world software packages. The bug we found in Tomcat 6.0 was immediately acknowledged and corrected by its development team.