Nils Morawietz

Christian Komusiewicz, Nils Morawietz, Frank Sommer et al.

A strength of parameterized algorithmics is that each problem can be parameterized by an essentially inexhaustible set of parameters. Usually, the choice of the considered parameter is informed by the theoretical relations between parameters with the general goal of achieving FPT-algorithms for smaller and smaller parameters. However, the FPT-algorithms for smaller parameters usually have higher running times and it is unclear whether the decrease in the parameter value or the increase in the running time bound dominates in real-world data. This question cannot be answered from purely theoretical considerations and any answer requires knowledge on typical parameter values. To provide a data-driven guideline for parameterized complexity studies of graph problems, we present the first comprehensive comparison of parameter values for a set of benchmark graphs originating from real-world applications. Our study covers degree-related parameters, such as maximum degree or degeneracy, neighborhood-based parameters such as neighborhood diversity and modular-width, modulator-based parameters such as vertex cover number and feedback vertex set number, and the treewidth of the graphs. Our results may help assess the significance of FPT-running time bounds on the solvability of real-world instances. For example, the vertex cover number $vc$ of $n$-vertex graphs is often only slightly below $n/2$. Thus, a running time bound of $O(2^{vc})$ is only slightly better than a running time bound of $O(1.4^{n})$. In contrast, the treewidth $tw$ is almost always below $n/3$ and often close to $n/10$, making a running time of $O(2^{tw})$ much more practical on real-world instances. We make our implementation and full experimental data openly available. In particular, this provides the first implementations for several graph parameters such as 4-path vertex cover number and vertex integrity.

Niels Grüttemeier, Christian Komusiewicz, Nils Morawietz

In Bayesian Network Structure Learning (BNSL), one is given a variable set and parent scores for each variable and aims to compute a DAG, called Bayesian network, that maximizes the sum of parent scores, possibly under some structural constraints. Even very restricted special cases of BNSL are computationally hard, and, thus, in practice heuristics such as local search are used. A natural approach for a local search algorithm is a hill climbing strategy, where one replaces a given BNSL solution by a better solution within some pre-defined neighborhood as long as this is possible. We study ordering-based local search, where a solution is described via a topological ordering of the variables. We show that given such a topological ordering, one can compute an optimal DAG whose ordering is within inversion distance $r$ in subexponential FPT time; the parameter $r$ allows to balance between solution quality and running time of the local search algorithm. This running time bound can be achieved for BNSL without structural constraints and for all structural constraints that can be expressed via a sum of weights that are associated with each parent set. We also introduce a related distance called `window inversions distance' and show that the corresponding local search problem can also be solved in subexponential FPT time for the parameter $r$. For two further natural modification operations on the variable orderings, we show that algorithms with an FPT time for $r$ are unlikely. We also outline the limits of ordering-based local search by showing that it cannot be used for common structural constraints on the moralized graph of the network.

Niels Grüttemeier, Nils Morawietz, Frank Sommer

Parameterized local search combines classic local search heuristics with the paradigm of parameterized algorithmics. While most local search algorithms aim to improve given solutions by performing one single operation on a given solution, the parameterized approach aims to improve a solution by performing $k$ simultaneous operations. Herein, $k$ is a parameter called search radius for which the value can be chosen by a user. One major goal in the field of parameterized local search is to outline the trade-off between the size of $k$ and the running time of the local search step. In this work, we introduce an abstract framework that generalizes natural parameterized local search approaches for a large class of partitioning problems: Given $n$ items that are partitioned into $b$ bins and a target function that evaluates the quality of the current partition, one asks whether it is possible to improve the solution by removing up to $k$ items from their current bins and reassigning them to other bins. Among others, our framework applies for the local search versions of problems like Cluster Editing, Vector Bin Packing, and Nash Social Welfare. Motivated by a real-world application of the problem Vector Bin Packing, we introduce a parameter called number of types $τ\le n$ and show that all problems fitting in our framework can be solved in $τ^k 2^{O(k)} |I|^{O(1)}$ time, where $|I|$ denotes the total input size. In case of Cluster Editing, the parameter $τ$ generalizes the well-known parameter neighborhood diversity of the input graph. We complement this by showing that for all considered problems, an algorithm significantly improving over our algorithm with running time $τ^k 2^{O(k)} |I|^{O(1)}$ would contradict the ETH. Additionally, we show that even on very restricted instances, all considered problems are W[1]-hard when parameterized by the search radius $k$ alone.

Florian Chudigiewitsch, Marlene Gründel, Christian Komusiewicz et al.

A relation modification problem gets a logical structure and a natural number k as input and asks whether k modifications of the structure suffice to make it satisfy a predefined property. We provide a complete classification of the classical and parameterized complexity of relation modification problems - the latter w. r. t. the modification budget k - based on the descriptive complexity of the respective target property. We consider different types of logical structures on which modifications are performed: Whereas monadic structures and undirected graphs without self-loops each yield their own complexity landscapes, we find that modifying undirected graphs with self-loops, directed graphs, or arbitrary logical structures is equally hard w. r. t. quantifier patterns. Moreover, we observe that all classes of problems considered in this paper are subject to a strong dichotomy in the sense that they are either very easy to solve (that is, they lie in paraAC^{0\uparrow} or TC^0) or intractable (that is, they contain W[2]-hard or NP-hard problems).

Arnaud Casteigts, Michelle Döring, Nils Morawietz

Given an undirected graph $G$, the problem of deciding whether $G$ admits a simple and proper time-labeling that makes it temporally connected is known to be NP-hard (Göbel et al., 1991). In this article, we relax this problem and ask whether a given degree sequence can be realized as a temporally connected graph. Our main results are a complete characterization of the feasible cases, and a recognition algorithm that runs in $O(n)$ time for graphical degree sequences (realized as simple temporal graphs) and in $O(n+m)$ time for multigraphical degree sequences (realized as non-simple temporal graphs, where the number of time labels on an edge corresponds to the multiplicity of the edge in the multigraph). In fact, these algorithms can be made constructive at essentially no cost. Namely, we give a constructive $O(n+m)$ time algorithm that outputs, for a given (multi)graphical degree sequence $\mathbf{d}$, a temporally connected graph whose underlying (multi)graph is a realization of $\mathbf{d}$, if one exists.

Arnaud Casteigts, Timothée Corsini, Nils Morawietz

A temporal graph is a graph whose edges appear at certain points in time. These graphs are temporally connected (in class TC) if all vertices can reach each other by temporal paths (traversing the edges in chronological order). Reachability based on temporal paths is not transitive, with important consequences. For instance, TC graphs do not always admit TC spanning trees. In this paper, we show that deciding if a given temporal graph admits a TC spanning tree is actually NP-complete. Then, we explore possible relaxations. A key feature of TC spanning trees is to support reachability along the same paths in both directions. We show that this property is not equivalent to TC spanning trees, it is more general and it can be tested in polynomial time. Still, minimizing the size of a spanner preserving this property -- a bidirectional spanner -- is \textsf{NP}-hard even more generally than TC spanning tree, including the setting of simple temporal graphs. Along the way, we show that deciding the existence of TC spanning tree is FPT when parameterized by the feedback edge set number (fes) of the underlying graph, and deciding bidirectional spanners of size $k$ is FPT when parameterized by fes + $\ell$ (the maximum number of labels per edge). On the structural side, we show that TC trees always admit a pivot vertex or a pivot edge -- reachable by all vertices by a certain time and able to reach all vertices afterward -- a fact that may be of independent interest.

Christian Komusiewicz, Nils Morawietz

A vertex set $W$ in a graph $G$ is a valid $k$-swap for a vertex cover $S$ of $G$ if $W$ has size at most $k$ and $S'=(S \setminus W) \cup (W \setminus S)$, the symmetric difference of $S$ and $W$, is a vertex cover of $G$. If $|S'| < |S|$, then $W$ is improving. In LS Vertex Cover, one is given a vertex cover $S$ of a graph $G$ and wants to know if there is a valid improving $k$-swap for $S$ in $G$. In applications of LS Vertex Cover, $k$ is a very small parameter that can be set by a user to determine the trade-off between running time and solution quality. Consequently, $k$ can be considered to be a constant. Motivated by this and the fact that LS Vertex Cover is W[1]-hard with respect to $k$, we aim for algorithms with running time $\ell^{f(k)}\cdot n^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ where $\ell$ is a structural graph parameter upper-bounded by $n$. We say that such a running time grows mildly with respect to $\ell$ and strongly with respect to $k$. We obtain algorithms with such a running time for $\ell$ being the $h$-index of $G$, the treewidth of $G$, or the modular-width of $G$. In addition, we consider a novel parameter, the maximum degree over all quotient graphs in a modular decomposition of $G$. Moreover, we adapt these algorithms to the more general problem where each vertex is assigned a weight and where we want to find a valid $d$-improving $k$-swap, that is, a valid $k$-swap which decreases the weight of the vertex cover by at least $d$.

Mario Grobler, Nils Morawietz, Silas Cato Sacher

The lettericity of a graph $G=(V,E)$ is defined as the smallest size of an alphabet $Σ$ such that there is a word $w_1 \dots w_{|V|} \in Σ^*$ and a decoder $\mathcal{D} \subseteq Σ^2$ with the property that $G$ is isomorphic to the letter graph $G(\mathcal{D}, w)$, that is, the graph with vertex set $\{1, \dots, n\}$ and edge set $\{ij \mid 1\leq i < j \leq n, w_iw_j \in \mathcal{D}\}$. Note that $G(\mathcal{D}, w)$ can be seen as a graph with inherent coloring $χ\colon V(G) \rightarrow Σ$. It is unknown whether the lettericity of a given graph can be computed in polynomial time. The problem to determine the lettericity of a given graph is called the lettericity problem. As a step towards answering the complexity of this problem, we investigate the following retrieval problems: given a graph $G$ together with two of the three solution-objects (word $w$, decoder $\mathcal{D}$, and coloring $χ$), the goal is to compute the third solution-object. We show that word retrieval and decoder retrieval are solvable in polynomial time, while coloring retrieval is equivalent to the graph isomorphism problem. Beyond this, we introduce symmetric lettericity which is a restricted version of lettericity where each decoder needs to be symmetrical ($ab\in \mathcal{D}$ if and only if $ba\in \mathcal{D}$). As we show, the symmetric lettericity of a graph always equals the neighborhood diversity of the graph, which in fact can be computed in linear time.

Arnaud Casteigts, Christian Komusiewicz, Nils Morawietz

Temporal graphs are graphs whose edges are only present at certain points in time. Reachability in these graphs relies on temporal paths, where edges are traversed chronologically. A temporal graph that offers all-pairs reachability is said to be temporally connected (or TC). For temporal graphs that are not TC, a natural question is whether they admit a TC subgraph (a.k.a. closed temporal component) of a given size $k$. This question was one of the earliest in the field, shown to be NP-hard by Bhadra and Ferreira in 2003. We strengthen this result dramatically, showing that deciding if a TC subgraph exists on at least $3$ vertices is already NP-hard in all the standard temporal graph settings (directed/undirected and strict/non-strict through simple and proper reductions). This implies a strong separation between closed temporal components and open temporal components (where temporal paths can travel outside the component), for which inclusion-maximal components can be found in polynomial time. As a by-product, our reductions strengthen a number of existing results and establish new derived results. They imply that the size of the largest TC subgraph cannot be approximated within a factor of $(1-ε)n$ in directed graphs, and within a factor of $(1-ε)\frac{n}{2}$ in undirected graphs. One of the reductions also completes the complexity landscape for TC subgraphs of size exactly $k$ when parameterized by $k$ (answering the missing non-strict case). Finally, on the structural side, our results imply that there exist arbitrarily large TC graphs of constant lifetime without nontrivial TC subgraphs, and we also show that there exist TC graphs of arbitrary girth, both facts being of independent interest.

Niels Grüttemeier, Christian Komusiewicz, Nils Morawietz

A Bayesian network is a directed acyclic graph that represents statistical dependencies between variables of a joint probability distribution. A fundamental task in data science is to learn a Bayesian network from observed data. \textsc{Polytree Learning} is the problem of learning an optimal Bayesian network that fulfills the additional property that its underlying undirected graph is a forest. In this work, we revisit the complexity of \textsc{Polytree Learning}. We show that \textsc{Polytree Learning} can be solved in $3^n \cdot |I|^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ time where $n$ is the number of variables and $|I|$ is the total instance size. Moreover, we consider the influence of the number of variables $d$ that might receive a nonempty parent set in the final DAG on the complexity of \textsc{Polytree Learning}. We show that \textsc{Polytree Learning} has no $f(d)\cdot |I|^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$-time algorithm, unlike Bayesian network learning which can be solved in $2^d \cdot |I|^{\mathcal{O}(1)}$ time. We show that, in contrast, if $d$ and the maximum parent set size are bounded, then we can obtain efficient algorithms.