Sam Sommerer

Bill Yuchen Lin, Chengsong Huang, Qian Liu et al. · allen-ai

Language models (LMs) have demonstrated their capability in possessing commonsense knowledge of the physical world, a crucial aspect of performing tasks in everyday life. However, it remains unclear **whether LMs have the capacity to generate grounded, executable plans for embodied tasks.** This is a challenging task as LMs lack the ability to perceive the environment through vision and feedback from the physical environment. In this paper, we address this important research question and present the first investigation into the topic. Our novel problem formulation, named **G-PlanET**, inputs a high-level goal and a data table about objects in a specific environment, and then outputs a step-by-step actionable plan for a robotic agent to follow. To facilitate the study, we establish an **evaluation protocol** and design a dedicated metric to assess the quality of the plans. Our experiments demonstrate that the use of tables for encoding the environment and an iterative decoding strategy can significantly enhance the LMs' ability in grounded planning. Our analysis also reveals interesting and non-trivial findings.

Andres Molina-Markham, Silvia G. Ionescu, Erin Lanus et al.

Evaluating the robustness of automated driving planners is a critical and challenging task. Although methodologies to evaluate vehicles are well established, they do not yet account for a reality in which vehicles with autonomous components share the road with adversarial agents. Our approach, based on probabilistic trust models, aims to help researchers assess the robustness of protections for machine learning-enabled planners against adversarial influence. In contrast with established practices that evaluate safety using the same evaluation dataset for all vehicles, we argue that adversarial evaluation fundamentally requires a process that seeks to defeat a specific protection. Hence, we propose that evaluations be based on estimating the difficulty for an adversary to determine conditions that effectively induce unsafe behavior. This type of inference requires precise statements about threats, protections, and aspects of planning decisions to be guarded. We demonstrate our approach by evaluating protections for planners relying on camera-based object detectors.