Pushpi Paranamana

Pushpi Paranamana, Pei Wang, Patrick Shafto

Evolution of beliefs of a society are a product of interactions between people (horizontal transmission) in the society over generations (vertical transmission). Researchers have studied both horizontal and vertical transmission separately. Extending prior work, we propose a new theoretical framework which allows application of tools from Markov chain theory to the analysis of belief evolution via horizontal and vertical transmission. We analyze three cases: static network, randomly changing network, and homophily-based dynamic network. Whereas the former two assume network structure is independent of beliefs, the latter assumes that people tend to communicate with those who have similar beliefs. We prove under general conditions that both static and randomly changing networks converge to a single set of beliefs among all individuals along with the rate of convergence. We prove that homophily-based network structures do not in general converge to a single set of beliefs shared by all and prove lower bounds on the number of different limiting beliefs as a function of initial beliefs. We conclude by discussing implications for prior theories and directions for future work.

Pei Wang, Junqi Wang, Pushpi Paranamana et al.

Cooperative communication plays a central role in theories of human cognition, language, development, culture, and human-robot interaction. Prior models of cooperative communication are algorithmic in nature and do not shed light on why cooperation may yield effective belief transmission and what limitations may arise due to differences between beliefs of agents. Through a connection to the theory of optimal transport, we establishing a mathematical framework for cooperative communication. We derive prior models as special cases, statistical interpretations of belief transfer plans, and proofs of robustness and instability. Computational simulations support and elaborate our theoretical results, and demonstrate fit to human behavior. The results show that cooperative communication provably enables effective, robust belief transmission which is required to explain feats of human learning and improve human-machine interaction.

Pei Wang, Pushpi Paranamana, Patrick Shafto

Cooperation information sharing is important to theories of human learning and has potential implications for machine learning. Prior work derived conditions for achieving optimal Cooperative Inference given strong, relatively restrictive assumptions. We relax these assumptions by demonstrating convergence for any discrete joint distribution, robustness through equivalence classes and stability under perturbation, and effectiveness by deriving bounds from structural properties of the original joint distribution. We provide geometric interpretations, connections to and implications for optimal transport, and connections to importance sampling, and conclude by outlining open questions and challenges to realizing the promise of Cooperative Inference.