1.2ITDec 30, 2015
Methods for Quantized Compressed SensingHao-Jun Michael Shi, Mindy Case, Xiaoyi Gu et al.
In this paper, we compare and catalog the performance of various greedy quantized compressed sensing algorithms that reconstruct sparse signals from quantized compressed measurements. We also introduce two new greedy approaches for reconstruction: Quantized Compressed Sampling Matching Pursuit (QCoSaMP) and Adaptive Outlier Pursuit for Quantized Iterative Hard Thresholding (AOP-QIHT). We compare the performance of greedy quantized compressed sensing algorithms for a given bit-depth, sparsity, and noise level.
1.2NASep 4, 2014
Practical approximate projection schemes in greedy signal space methodsChris Garnatz, Xiaoyi Gu, Alison Kingman et al.
Compressive sensing (CS) is a new signal acquisition paradigm which shows that far fewer samples are required to reconstruct sparse signals than previously thought. Although most of the literature focuses on signals sparse in a fixed orthonormal basis, recently the Signal Space CoSaMP (SSCoSaMP) greedy method was developed for the reconstruction of signals compressible in arbitrary redundant dictionaries. The algorithm itself needs access to approximate sparse projection schemes, which have been difficult to obtain and analyze. This paper investigates the use of several different projection schemes and catalogs for what types of signals each scheme can successfully be utilized. In addition, we present novel hybrid projection methods which outperform all other schemes on a wide variety of signal classes.
1.2NANov 12, 2015
A note on practical approximate projection schemes in signal space methodsXiaoyi Gu, Deanna Needell, Shenyinying Tu
Compressive sensing (CS) is a new technology which allows the acquisition of signals directly in compressed form, using far fewer measurements than traditional theory dictates. Recently, many so-called signal space methods have been developed to extend this body of work to signals sparse in arbitrary dictionaries rather than orthonormal bases. In doing so, CS can be utilized in a much broader array of practical settings. Often, such approaches often rely on the ability to optimally project a signal onto a small number of dictionary atoms. Such optimal, or even approximate, projections have been difficult to derive theoretically. Nonetheless, it has been observed experimentally that conventional CS approaches can be used for such projections, and still provide accurate signal recovery. In this letter, we summarize the empirical evidence and clearly demonstrate for what signal types certain CS methods may be used as approximate projections. In addition, we provide theoretical guarantees for such methods for certain sparse signal structures. Our theoretical results match those observed in experimental studies, and we thus establish both experimentally and theoretically that these CS methods can be used in this context. \end{abstract}
Statistical Analysis of Nearest Neighbor Methods for Anomaly DetectionXiaoyi Gu, Leman Akoglu, Alessandro Rinaldo
Nearest-neighbor (NN) procedures are well studied and widely used in both supervised and unsupervised learning problems. In this paper we are concerned with investigating the performance of NN-based methods for anomaly detection. We first show through extensive simulations that NN methods compare favorably to some of the other state-of-the-art algorithms for anomaly detection based on a set of benchmark synthetic datasets. We further consider the performance of NN methods on real datasets, and relate it to the dimensionality of the problem. Next, we analyze the theoretical properties of NN-methods for anomaly detection by studying a more general quantity called distance-to-measure (DTM), originally developed in the literature on robust geometric and topological inference. We provide finite-sample uniform guarantees for the empirical DTM and use them to derive misclassification rates for anomalous observations under various settings. In our analysis we rely on Huber's contamination model and formulate mild geometric regularity assumptions on the underlying distribution of the data.